Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Darryl Thayer
-wrenches re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 8:42 PM Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers Friends: Here is a related problem:  If we use an 80 amp GFD (ground fault detection) breaker, even for a very small array, we have to use 3AWG CU wire from

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread jay peltz
Hi William, I agree with you on the GFP. There is a work around for the larger breaker size and that is to install a prebreaker from the array then to the GFP breaker then to the CC. You then get to work on the smallest breaker size for wiring, if my understanding of the code is correct. jay

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Kent Osterberg
William, Square D used to make a QO breaker body without the overcurrent trip mechanism. Internally it just had the switch contacts and it was intended for use as a disconnect in locations where overcurrent protection was already provided. The reason I mention this is that the 80-amp PV GFP

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread b...@midnitesolar.com
A lot of good replies have come by here but here goes another one... The GFP cannot be used for dual purpose as a disconnect for battery or PV input and you are not allowed to un-ground the system by turning off the DC input or output breaker. 4 AWG should be fine for 80 amps. If you need/want

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Kent Osterberg
William, There have been too many fires where GFP failed to operate correctly to argue that they are really good at what they are supposed to do. But, I think it is inappropriate to say they don't really work at all. How many fires could have or would have happened without the GFP devices?

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Darryl Thayer
: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers A lot of good replies have come by here but here goes another one... The GFP cannot be used for dual purpose as a disconnect for battery or PV input and you are not allowed to un-ground

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread b...@midnitesolar.com
. *From:* b...@midnitesolar.com b...@midnitesolar.com *To:* RE-wrenches re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:08 PM *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers A lot of good replies have come by here but here goes another one... The GFP cannot

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Philip
...@midnitesolar.com b...@midnitesolar.com To: RE-wrenches re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers A lot of good replies have come by here but here goes another one... The GFP cannot be used

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Philip
Hi Kent, I wanted to add a little more re positive grounding. OutBack's communication structure, like many other manufacturers, is referenced to Negative. If you install multiple devices in a positive ground system and connect them together via a Hub and add disconnects/overcurrent protection

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread b...@midnitesolar.com
Here is Robin's 2 cents worth on this subject In a PV input circuit to a charge controller that has a 63 or 80 amp DC-GFP, it is perfectly legal to use a small wire. That is because you will also have the appropriate sized breaker in series with the DC-GFP breaker. If you want to use

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-18 Thread Kent Osterberg
Phil, While using a dual GFDI to open both positive and negative array conductors is the safest thing to do in battery systems, and it is clearly compliant with 690.5 to do so, it is not consistent with the manufacturer's instructions or the device listing. So that leads back to a violation

[RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-17 Thread Nathan Stumpff
Wrenches, In a job coming up I have a customer with an existing FM60 controller, 520 watt (!!) array. We are doing a ton of work, including adding a 4 kW solar array with Classic 150 charge controller. I am trying to figure out how to handle the GFP. For the Classic, I need a 90 or 100 A

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-17 Thread Kent Osterberg
Nathan, I don't think anyone makes a 100-amp PV GFP. The panel mount breaker model that's being used for the PV GFP doesn't include a 100-amp breaker. The Classic has a built-in GFP so you shouldn't need an external GFP for it. You will need to add a GFP for the FM60 - a single 80-amp GFP

Re: [RE-wrenches] GFP and multiple charge controllers

2012-04-17 Thread William Miller
Friends: Here is a related problem: If we use an 80 amp GFD (ground fault detection) breaker, even for a very small array, we have to use 3AWG CU wire from the battery buss to the breaker and from the breaker to the FM or MX60. This seems like a big hassle for 5 or 10 amps of charging. A