Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-24 Thread Dave Tedeyan
lugs that accept multiple conductors, so no > piercing of conductors needs to happen. > > > > Good luck, > > Glenn > > > > *From:* RE-wrenches > *On Behalf Of *Jeff Clearwater > *Sent:* Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:20 PM > *To:* RE-wrenches > > *S

Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-23 Thread Jeff Clearwater
that accept multiple conductors, so no piercing of conductors needs to happen. Good luck, Glenn *From:*RE-wrenches *On Behalf Of *Jeff Clearwater *Sent:* Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:20 PM *To:* RE-wrenches *Subject:* [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection? Este

Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-23 Thread Jeff Clearwater
Thanks August, Yes so August has illuminated an alternative to the J-box supply side tap approach that uses standard equipment and a load side connection but still satisfies it being considered a 200 A connection by PG&E - hence no need for a service upgrade and CTs for commercial accounts as

Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-23 Thread August Goers
Replying on list, I had mistakenly only replied to Jeff off list. -August On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 6:26 AM August Goers wrote: > Hi Jeff - I think technically you can try a supply side connection per NEC > 705.12(A) if you can find equipment with provisions to both feed your > existing service an

Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-21 Thread Jeff Clearwater
Hey August, Jay, and Burt and all, Thanks for the great input! and I'm sorry if I wasn't clearer. They are not asking for 400 Amps - I suggested it as that was the rating of the solar ready panel I specified. They are just saying IF it's 400 Amps then they need room for CTs cause it's a shop

Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-17 Thread Jay
an option for lugs that accept multiple conductors, so no piercing of > conductors needs to happen. > > Good luck, > Glenn > > From: RE-wrenches On Behalf Of > Jeff Clearwater > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 3:20 PM > To: RE-wrenches > Subject: [RE-wrenches]

Re: [RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-17 Thread Glenn Burt
Panel vs adding Supply Side connection? Esteemed Wrenches, I am in need of changing out an existing 200 Amp service entrance in order to accommodate a bus capable of handling a a 200 Amp Solar backfeed (41 KW system) . PG&E is upgrading the transformer to handle the backfeed but wh

[RE-wrenches] SolarReady Service Panel vs adding Supply Side connection?

2019-10-17 Thread Jeff Clearwater
Esteemed Wrenches, I am in need of changing out an existing 200 Amp service entrance in order to accommodate a bus capable of handling a a 200 Amp Solar backfeed (41 KW system) . PG&E is upgrading the transformer to handle the backfeed but when I proposed a Siemens SolarReady 400 Amp service