That document refers to 2008 NEC 690.9 code which has the exemption that is
used for grounded inverters. Section 690.35 for ungrounded systems just
refers back to 690.9 for over-current protection. So I do not see any
indication that two strings on an ungrounded inverter could not have the
same
Hi Dan
Can you provide any documentation on this?
Thanks Jay
Peltz power.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 28, 2016, at 8:52 PM,
> wrote:
>
> While Brian T. is correct that fusing is not required for string-to-string
> overcurrent
While Brian T. is correct that fusing is not required for string-to-string overcurrent protection with two strings into two channels, there is another reason to require fusing. Transformerless inverters like Fronius Primo have no transformer to provide AC-DC isolation, so a ground fault can allow
Al,
As long as you only have a max of two strings going into each of the
separate MPPT channels, no string fusing is needed. So with four strings,
two on each MPPT input channel in the inverter, no string fusing is needed.
This is one of the big advantages to having multiple MPPT channels in GT
Hi Al,
My understanding of dual mppt inverters is that they are treated nearly as two
inverters on the DC side. The requirement for fusing on multi string arrays has
to do with the reverse flow of current in the event of a fault on one of the
strings. 2 strings are safe, 3 or more and you can
Regarding the primo we just installed 5 at a location and used the midnite
with the switch, (mnpv6 disco) its the only way on this inverter to perform
any testing. With all the issues it helped out a great deal.
Jerry
On Jan 27, 2016 4:09 AM, "Allen Frishman" wrote:
>
Wrenchers,
What is the requirement for fusing 2 strings per MPPT? Specifically for an
inverter like the Fronius Primo that has no integrated fuses.If you run 2
strings to each MPPT do you need to fuse each string?In this case there is
a total of 4 strings which would need to be
7 matches
Mail list logo