thanks for the link Dave, very useful.
Nick Vida___
List sponsored by Home Power magazine
List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
List-Archive: http://lis
Nick, I don't see that name (or an alternate term) in the report on
proposals (do a search for "120%" or "4-375a").
http://www.nfpa.org/Assets/files/AboutTheCodes/70/70_A2013_NEC-P04_ROPballot.pdf
On 2012/3/9 16:45, Nick Vida wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if any of you wise wrenches know if 's
Hello,
I was wondering if any of you wise wrenches know if 'solar accumulation panel'
is still the name proposed to be used in the NEC. I think I remember Bill
Brooks mentioning that they couldn't get it in for 2011, but that it will
probably be good for 2014. I was wondering because here in L
he feeder circuit.
> But frequently sillier minds prevail.
> Darryl
> --- On Thu, 2/4/10, Andrew Truitt wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew Truitt
> > Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Solar accumulation panel (revisited)
> > To: "RE-wrenches"
> > Date: Thursday, February
:
> From: Andrew Truitt
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Solar accumulation panel (revisited)
> To: "RE-wrenches"
> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2010, 1:58 PM
>
> First - Thank you all for the useful information! Bill -
> I'm sorry to hear that this didn't make i
org
> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Drake
> Chamberlin
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:59 AM
> To: RE-wrenches
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Solar accumulation panel
>
>
> P.S.
>
> In many cases it would be necessary to use a fused
ubject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Solar accumulation panel
P.S.
In many cases it would be necessary to use a fused AC disconnect to stay
within the inverter manufacturer's specifications.
At 12:53 PM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
Here is a wild idea. If you look at the Enphase inverter system
P.S.
In many cases it would be necessary to use a fused AC disconnect to
stay within the inverter manufacturer's specifications.
At 12:53 PM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
Here is a wild idea. If you look at the Enphase inverter systems,
several inverters connect together in parallel before going to
ists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Truitt
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:57 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Solar accumulation panel
Team wrenches - I feel like I've seen a provision in the Code for
installing a sub-panel
sum of supply
breakers no greater than 120%. Much more restrictive.
Bill.
From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
[mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Andrew
Truitt
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:57 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Solar
flowing across the buses here), but the key is to affix a
permanent label so that no additional breakers are ever added- just in
case the next person along assumes that everything is NEC compliant.
DKC
---- Original Message ----
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Solar accumulation panel
From: And
Andrew,
I have done this for multiple installs, most recently on a commercial
three phase 240 install (with 6 SMA 7000s) and a residential two
circuit Enphase install. The plans were submitted to the AHJ and
approved in both cases without question. I labeled these per 705.10
and 690.64.
The com
Andrew:
It is not in the code. It is an argument you make to your own AHJ.
William
At 10:57 AM 1/12/2010, you wrote:
Team wrenches - I feel like I've seen a provision in the Code for
installing a sub-panel to aggregate PV inverter outputs for the purpose of
simplifying the actual grid con
Team wrenches - I feel like I've seen a provision in the Code for installing
a sub-panel to aggregate PV inverter outputs for the purpose of simplifying
the actual grid connection (such as for a line-side tap) but I can't find it
in 690. I also seem to remember specific verbiage that needs to be o
14 matches
Mail list logo
