Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2014, 08:47:49 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
> > However within "normal" s-expressions or neotheric expressions I'd have
> second thoughts. How would this be parsed?:
>
> > foo bar
> > . aaa . bbb ccc
>
> I agree, that should be an error. It doesn't really make any sense
> However within "normal" s-expressions or neotheric expressions I'd have
second thoughts. How would this be parsed?:
> foo bar
> . aaa . bbb ccc
I agree, that should be an error. It doesn't really make any sense to me
either. I expect this would continue to be ok:
aaa bbb . ccc
=>
(aaa bbb .
Am 26.11.2014 um 23:32 schrieb David A. Wheeler:
> This is a request for comment:
> In sweet-expressions, should a line beginning with "." have the same
> semantics as wisp?
>
> In wisp, I understand that a line beginning with "." is interpreted as a
> sequence of expressions at the same level.
