Re: [Readable-discuss] Bug (or feature??): multiline comment acts as SPLIT

2012-08-02 Thread Alpheus Madsen
As a general rule, I expect multi-line comments to be comments that just disappear when compiled. Oh, and this will likely make the implementation of comments more complicated, but would it be possible to make these comments nested? It has always bugged me, where multi-line comments are allowed,

Re: [Readable-discuss] Presentation on readable s-expressions

2012-08-02 Thread Alpheus Madsen
I don't know why, but I've always been bothered by calling s-exprs ugly; it's something that has bothered me ever since I've discovered sweet-expressions. Although I don't yet have much experience in Lispy programming, I find the syntax of s-exprs rather beautiful; it has a certain simplicity

Re: [Readable-discuss] LISP as a BASH alternative?

2012-07-26 Thread Alpheus Madsen
This is actually a major reason I'm interested in Sweet-Expressions, myself. I'd like to use some form of Common Lisp as a shell, and it would be kindof awkward to have to use parentheses for everything. On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:11 PM, David A. Wheeler dwhee...@dwheeler.comwrote: Ben Booth:

Re: [Readable-discuss] The . as indentation whitespace proposal

2012-07-20 Thread Alpheus Madsen
, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Alpheus Madsen alpheus.mad...@gmail.com wrote: Certainly using --| is very heavy, but the point of using . is that it is much lighter visually. Just for clarification: I've never used --| in a language as official syntax; I've used it (and variations

Re: [Readable-discuss] PROPOSAL: Use ! as an indenting character and drop . entirely

2012-07-20 Thread Alpheus Madsen
I'm still kindof neutral on whether or not there should be a non-whitespace character that acts as a whitespace character. Even so, I'm also inclined to think that, since we're talking about Lisp, there's always a chance that somewhere, someone has written a function or macro that begins with a

Re: [Readable-discuss] Bundle of git changes

2012-07-20 Thread Alpheus Madsen
I dislike the name modern-expressions Can you propose some alternative names? It was my understanding that modern-expressions was the name of the rule that transformed the standard s-expr (function arg1 arg2 arg3) into the sweet-expression form function(arg1 arg2 arg3) It is this

Re: [Readable-discuss] Arne Babenhauserheide proposal: use . on own line instead of group

2012-07-18 Thread Alpheus Madsen
I've been trying to keep up with the activity that's been going on this past month; but since I've been busy doing other things as well, I think I failed. Even so, I've tried to review everything, and so I'd like to share some thoughts. First, I'm not sure what the status of \ is; or how it

Re: [Readable-discuss] Arne Babenhauserheide proposal: use . on own line instead of group

2012-07-18 Thread Alpheus Madsen
I've been trying to keep up with the activity that's been going on this past month; but since I've been busy doing other things as well, I think I failed. Even so, I've tried to review everything, and so I'd like to share some thoughts. First, I'm not sure what the status of \ is; or how it