Alan Manuel Gloria:
> If back compatibility with Lisp in general was not an issue, what I
> thought I'd do was, I'd be like this:
...
At that point, of course, it's a completely new language, not just a new
notation.
Nothing wrong with new languages, of course. Indeed, historically Haskell grew
I just want to warn that this is entirely non-serious, except it is.
If you didn't have to worry about back-compat, what would you do?
On 2/21/13, Alan Manuel Gloria wrote:
> If back compatibility with Lisp in general was not an issue, what I
> thought I'd do was, I'd be like this:
>
> 1. Disall
