Hi Jeff
>
> > What happened to the $50 weekly best contributed
> script
> > prize that was going a while ago :-)
>
> It was US$100, and it was only for a limited time. :)
How about starting it again :-)
>
> > Also, I note that no new user scripts have been
> published
> > on rebol.
Hi,
Anyone interested in testing my Rebol application this
thanksgiving weekend :-)
It's an email to sms gateway. You have to be registered
with www.mtnsms.com though.
Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject line as
cellphoneno-in-international-format mtnsms-password
mtnsms-userid
Howdy, Graham:
> What happened to the $50 weekly best contributed script
> prize that was going a while ago :-)
It was US$100, and it was only for a limited time. :)
> Also, I note that no new user scripts have been published
> on rebol.com for a long while now.
Work on REBOL
Thanks Holger:
==
I was hoping that you would respond. That is
consitent with the fact that this works on other servers
that I have tested.
I'm glad to have your input!
..
Is it possible that you could
Hello Graham,
Seems to work here (Amiga version).
Here's a sample REBOL session:
REBOL/Core 2.3.0.1.1 22-Jun-2000
Copyright 2000 REBOL Technologies. All rights reserved.
## bademail: make email! "nospam"
== nospam
## error? try [send bademail {testing}]
== true
## print mold disarm try [send b
> Orthogonality: A measure of how accurately a system's axes maintain a 90
degrees relationship among them
Squareness. Everything works the same way no matter what combination is
done. In real life a knife is used to cut with, a screwdriver is used to
turn screws. In Rebol, 'insert puts things int
In computing terms:
'Mutually independent; well separated; sometimes, irrelevant
to. Used in a generalisation of its mathematical meaning to
describe sets of primitives or capabilities that, like a
vector basis in geometry, span the entire "capability space"
of the system and are in some
Hi Andrew, Ladislav
This example may help resolve the question in a direct fashion. We can use
do/next to identify the first expression in a block.
>> x: 1 y: 2 z: 3
== 3
>> do/next [do x y z]
== [1 [y z]]
This shows that the inner do consumed only one argument.
>> take2: func [x y] ["hello"]
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 11:10:42AM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
> Hi
>
> Write/append causes a failure when I attempt to append to a remote file.
>
> Full reads and writes are performed successfully:
>
> i.e. :
> ;where blk is a block of test:
> write/lines full-path blk ;executes successfully
Hi
Write/append causes a failure when I attempt to append to a remote file.
Full reads and writes are performed successfully:
i.e. :
;where blk is a block of test:
write/lines full-path blk ;executes successfully
read/lines full-path ; works too!
write/append full-path "this is a
Orthogonality:
A measure of how accurately a system's axes maintain a 90
degrees relationship among them
Help me out here...
Cheerfulness,
EAT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The concept involved is "orthogonality".
>
>
GC> Can a function have a variable number of arguments?
AM> No. But you can simulate it, by using 'any-type! function specifiers and passing
unset! as arguments. Better is to use refinements.
LM> Yes, a function can have a variable number of arguments. Do is such a function, as
e.g. in:
take-
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 12:59:26 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> How about this:
>
> bademail: to-email "bogus"
>
> ERROR? try [send bademail "testing"]
>
> TRY by itself won't prevent the evaluation of the error,
> but
> ERROR? will.
Oops, that was the only part of my script that didn't h
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 12:50:46 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > o Volume of submissions has been low. Why??
> >
Hi Jeff,
What happened to the $50 weekly best contributed script
prize that was going a while ago :-)
Also, I note that no new user scripts have been published on
rebol.com fo
> > o Volume of submissions has been low. Why??
>
> Too few time, too much to do...
:-) Such is the state of life . . .
> > Sensible enhancements to existing mezzanine functions
> > will be likely accepted.This definitely includes
> > existing protocols.
>
> I'd like to d
Howdy, Graham:
How about this:
bademail: to-email "bogus"
ERROR? try [send bademail "testing"]
TRY by itself won't prevent the evaluation of the error, but
ERROR? will.
-jeff
> > GC> bademail: make email! "nospam"
> >
> > GC> try [ send bademail {testing} ]
> >
> > GC> Fails in b
The concept involved is "orthogonality".
-jeff
>Seems like it should work differently where files are
> concerned. I mean, when would it be neccessary to allocate
> space for a filenamewhen REBOL already doesit
> internally? When would a file name ever be "that" long?
>
Seems like it should work differently where files are
concerned. I mean, when would it be neccessary to allocate
space for a file name when REBOL already does it
internally? When would a file name ever be "that" long?
Anyway, those are my thoughts.
Cheerfulness,
What Ladislav says is correct, and this is _NOT_ a bug. This is a
pretty fundamental aspect of how REBOL datatypes work.
MAKE creates a new datatype and
TO converts a datatye.
MAKE file! 44
creates a new file! with room for 44 characters, which is very much
like:
MAKE string! 44
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 12:24:07PM -0800, Larry Palmiter wrote:
> Using Core 2.4.39.3.1 (the Windows version), it seems that now/time/precise
> returns a time with a resolution of only 0.01 second, not microsecond or
> even millisecond. Is there some way of obtaining the higher precisions
> menti
Russell Yost pointed out:
> As a rank amateur, couldn't a function handle a variable number of arguments if they
>were "passed" in a single block?
Of course. That's the best way of passing any number of arguments. You can also pass
the multiple arguments as a string of characters as well if tha
Hi Holger
> The resolution of the time! datatype is one nanosecond. To get
> the current date/time with the highest possible resolution provided
> by the operating system use now/precise (with current experimentals
> only). If you only need the time, without the date, use now/precise/time.
>
> Th
Hi Mat,
>
> GC> bademail: make email! "nospam"
>
> GC> try [ send bademail {testing} ]
>
> GC> Fails in both the current experimental and stable
> versions
> GC> of win32.
>
> Does that not depend on whether your relay accepted the
> mail or not?
>
I think my point is that the try should al
No comments Pekr!! :o)
--Lorenz
- Original Message -
From: "Petr Krenzelok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 11:08 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: help on padding
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Mailbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAI
Hi
Write/append causes a failure when I attempt to append to a remote file.
Full reads and writes are performed successfully:
i.e. :
;where blk is a block of test:
write/lines full-path blk ;executes successfully
read/lines full-path ; works too!
write/append full-path "this is a
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 07:12:56PM +, Mat Bettinson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a rudimentary IRC bot working in Rebol. However it's all a
> hideous kludge because the only way I've seen to check to see if a
> port has data is to wait for it.
>
> Is there a more elegant way? Would empty? w
Heya Graham,
GC> bademail: make email! "nospam"
GC> try [ send bademail {testing} ]
GC> Fails in both the current experimental and stable versions
GC> of win32.
Does that not depend on whether your relay accepted the mail or not?
--
Mat Bettinson - EuroGamer's Gaming Evangelist with a Goatee
Hello,
I've got a rudimentary IRC bot working in Rebol. However it's all a
hideous kludge because the only way I've seen to check to see if a
port has data is to wait for it.
Is there a more elegant way? Would empty? work on a low-level
TCP port?
Also, is there any built-in time type functions
As a rank amateur, couldn't a function handle a variable number of arguments
if they were "passed" in a single block?
Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 3:10 PM
Subject: [REBOL]
I don't know if this is WAD, but try fails to catch this
error:
bademail: make email! "nospam"
try [ send bademail {testing} ]
Fails in both the current experimental and stable versions
of win32.
--
Graham Chiu
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Hello: I'm not sure where this thread started...
but alternatively, one could have a function with
a block as argument.
With rebol's type? and length? native values,
then the code block could really be designed to
process any number of "pseudo-arguments" in the
block.
JMTCW
tj
--
To unsubscri
- Original Message -
From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 1:30 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Rebol and UDP
> #26-Nov-00# Message from *Petr Krenzelok*:
> Hi Petr,
>
> > something about so called "half closed" connections. It's interesting -
>
#26-Nov-00# Message from *Petr Krenzelok*:
Hi Petr,
> something about so called "half closed" connections. It's interesting -
> although server closed connection, we were able to throw more data to it -
> it was just ignored at the data processing level, or so it seems to me ...
> confusion, conf
- Original Message -
From: Mailbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 1:38 PM
Subject: [REBOL] help on padding
> Using the function below I'd like to get a sequence of seven days
> starting from a date entered by the user but don't understand w
Hi Guys,
Well the beta expiration date for view on Win98 is 30/11 any chance on
a new release or an extension on the existing one??
Cheers Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
Using the function below I'd like to get a sequence of seven days
starting from a date entered by the user but don't understand why
it does not work. Could you help me?
Thanks
--Carlos
REBOL[]
; Joel Nelly's function
zpad: func[n [number!] w[integer!] /local s][
s: to-string n
if w > lengt
- Original Message -
From: Holger Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2000 3:07 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Rebol and UDP
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 02:31:13AM +0100, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> > REBOL
> > would have to store packet identifiers in a bloc
Hi,
> Ladislav Mecir wrote:
> > Andrew Martin wrote:
> > > Graham Chiu wrote:
>
> > > > Can a function have a variable number of arguments?
>
> > > No. But you can simulate it, by using 'any-type! function specifiers
and
> passing unset! as arguments. Better is to use refinements.
>
> > Yes, a fu
38 matches
Mail list logo
