Hi,
I've managed a crude way to parse a mobile email address down to its
phone number (area code, and 7 digit number) using a loop and if
statements. However, I'm wondering if there's a more efficient way to do
it (shortcuts in REBOL)
Basically I'm trying to do this...
Mobile Email Address:
Matthew Kim wrote:
Hi,
I've managed a crude way to parse a mobile email address down to its
phone number (area code, and 7 digit number) using a loop and if
statements. However, I'm wondering if there's a more efficient way to do
it (shortcuts in REBOL)
Basically I'm trying to do this...
Hi Matthew
Matthew Kim wrote:
..
Basically I'm trying to do this...
Mobile Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parsing algorithm
Result:
~~~
Area Code: 416
Phone Number: 5551234
You could use parse ...
mea: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parse mea [
I'm wondering if there's a more efficient way to do it (shortcuts in
REBOL)
Basically I'm trying to do this...
Mobile Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Parsing algorithm
Result:
~~~
Area Code: 416
Phone Number: 5551234
Digit and Alpha are defined by one of my
On 11-Jun-02, Joel Neely wrote:
Hi Joel,
Good to have you back.
And see below...
Carl Read wrote:
I think we need it, but not so much because it'd be easier
(perhaps) for programming, but because it's more descriptive. For
instance, we know what this means...
At 18:45 11.6.2002 +1200, you wrote:
I'm wondering if there's a more efficient way to do it (shortcuts in
REBOL)
Basically I'm trying to do this...
Mobile Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As international user, i would like to point out that many countries have
totally different
Hi Mark,
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 6:30:46 AM, you wrote:
MC 1) Agree a lot of the function needed can not be implemented well without
MC true multitasking especially a lot of Network programming that need
MC multithreads.
I'd like to point out, that multithreading would only be needed
Are there any good tutorials out there for using Action and alt-action
and similar VID extensions?
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the
subject, without the quotes.
Hi, Carl,
Carl Read wrote:
Good to have you back.
Thanks, although I'll probably be intermittent for the next
few weeks (wedding is 6 July)...
Okay, not a good example, so you missed my point. (:
I don't think so... but it's possible. My response was simply
that it's easy to deal
Now answering my own email ...
Ingo Hohmann wrote:
Ammon Johnson wrote:
Use the SOURCE, Luke! The SOURCE will not fail you... ;-)
Unless it does, of course ...
a: make object! [ blk: [ print HI ] set 'f func [][ do blk ]]
f
HI
source f
f: func [][do blk]
blk
Thanks for your help everyone! All these solutions are great!
Joanna, that's a very good point about international numbers. However
at this point I can get away with not worrying about it... whew! It
definitely sounds a lot more complicated.
Cheers,
Matt
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Gabriele,
I partially agree with you. Multitasking is not needed only to develop
server processes, since there could be many occasions where I should
need more than one process in parallel at-a-time, even in client
applications.
I wish to simplify the life of Rebol developers, so I can say I
Hi,
a: make object! [ blk: [print 'Hi] set 'f func [] [do blk]]
f
Hi
source f
f: func [][do blk]
The little bit above is an actual cut and paste from a fresh REBOL/Command
console on Linux RedHat 7.2 if you actually get something different
somewhere else please let us know.
I
IANARTE, but I suspect that the level of effort to allow users
to define additional DATATYPE! values might be non-trivial.
That assumption motivated me to wonder about whether there
could be some simpler enhancements that might still add value
to the development of reliable scripts, and led to
Hi Bryan,
Are there any good tutorials out there for using Action and alt-action
and similar VID extensions?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Normal use is like this:
view layout [button Press Me! [print action][print alt-action]]
You can change feel/engage for faces to get
Hi Joel,
In other words, we'd be specifying (a portion of) the *interface* that
an object should possess, rather than a (non-REBOL) notion of class.
This would allow the above hypothetical function definition to be
written as:
somefunc: func [
a [object! [invert]]
b
Hi Allesandro,
I wish to simplify the life of Rebol developers, so I can say I can use
every instrument to create multiprocesses: multiprocess (like a FORK),
multithread (Ms Windows-style) either preemptive or cooperative (even if
the last one is not the best system... however is a good
Hi Joel,
Joel Neely wrote:
..
somefunc: func [
a [object! [invert]]
b [object! [memorize]]
...
][
...blah blah blah...
... a/invert ...
... b/memorize ...
]
to document/enforce that the first argument must possess an
Hi Gregg, Joel,
Either way would suite me fine,
somefunc: func [
a [object! [(first proto-a)]]
b [object! [(first proto-b)]]
...
][
...blah blah blah...
... a/invert ...
... b/memorize ...
]
;-)
Ammon
A short time ago,
Hi,
Ok, in that sense, you are right. If you need to know the value of words
that are given within the context of a function, source will not give that to
you as it only appears as a word in the function. However you have shown me
a very valuable tool for finding the value of a word
Hi Joel and Gregg,
Gregg's suggestion is absolutely straightforward, that is what prototypes
are for. My contribution is a function, that checks this:
compatible?: func [
prototype [object!]
object [object!]
] [
empty? exclude first prototype first object
]
Hi Gregg,
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 6:53:46 PM, you wrote:
GI What about specifying a prototype object instead of a block of words for an
GI anonymous object? I'm thinking that the list of words could get quite long
GI and perhaps be used in many places which might become burdensome.
Given
I'm heading on a long vacation and really don't want my mail box filled
with rebol messages while I'm
gone. How do I unsubscribe when listar rejects me as not a member of
list rebol? I suspect that it's due to the use of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (list name) which forwards to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] which
Hi, Gregg,
Gregg Irwin wrote:
What about specifying a prototype object instead of a block of
words for an anonymous object? I'm thinking that the list of
words could get quite long and perhaps be used in many places
which might become burdensome.
Actually, I'd prefer to say What about
Hi
A short time ago, Joel Neely, sent an email stating:
Hi, Gregg,
Gregg Irwin wrote:
What about specifying a prototype object instead of a block of
words for an anonymous object? I'm thinking that the list of
words could get quite long and perhaps be used in many places
which might
25 matches
Mail list logo
