As Max wrote:
> I love philosophy so, nothing here is personal... :-)
> Volker suggested:
> > how about extending path syntax?
> > a/5:10
>
> How about these two alternatives:
> a/5-10
> a/5..10
> ?
> Both use reasonably common indicators which mean "missing something out,
> which
Volker suggested:
> how about extending path syntax?
> a/5:10
How about these two alternatives:
a/5-10
a/5..10
?
Both use reasonably common indicators which mean "missing something out,
which is very obvious".
Andrew J Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://www.rebol.it/Valley/
http://valle
Hi, Robert,
Types are the issue... See below.
Robert M. Münch wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 11:28:07 +0200, Ingo Hohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> change next pos: find test key pos/2 + 1
>>== []
>> >> test
>>== ["Bug Report" 2]
>>
>>Though I'm sure, someone will come up with a better
This might help:
foreach [cond code][
series? [print "series" break]
number? [print "number"]
][if do reduce [cond value] code]
when value is a series or number.
Don't forget this either:
value: 'hello
switch type?/word value [int
Oh, I see what you're trying to do.
I agree there seems to be missing a
native to set the selected value.
We have SELECT to get the value, but
we have nothing to set the value,
except the long solutions so far offered.
Anton.
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:57:52 +1000, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use SAME?
a: b: [123]
same? a b
;== true
Anton.
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 16:08:00 +1000, Anton Rolls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > You just maintain a list of visited blocks.
>
> How do you this? I think you will need something like Ladislav's "equal"
> function, right? Or how can you che
a[ 5 : 10 ] instead of
copy/part skip a 5 skip a 10
?
how about extending path syntax?
a/5:10
?
a/(5 + 7 + 29 + 3) is hard to read IMHO. the "/" is very hidden now.
how about something spreadsheet-oriented?
could even be a whole datatype.
i would like to position inside a matrix, so having
a:
ok here you are a newer version which also takes objects with functions ;)
start of
code-
nargs: func [f [word! path!] /local rslt ref? args refs fn rf obj][
rf: copy []
fn: either word? f [
get f
][
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch wrote:
<...>
> advanced features get used by advanced users... a lot of the code I see from
> the guru is hard to read for me, simply because it uses tricks I have not
> stumbled on yet... The words are all similar, but when looking at them, they
> seem to have
before I start,
I don't want you to know that I agree to most of what you say in theory, I'm
just trying to see if there isn't a way to extend the base syntax in a way that
code is shorter, and easier to read. Since we are in email, the tone gets
perceived by the reader, not sent by the writter
Hi Volker,
VN> Gregg, cool . but how about parse?
>>> b: [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14]
VN> == [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14]
>>> parse b[ 4 skip copy v 2 skip]
VN> == false
>>> v
VN> == [5 6]
That would work well for a single slice, but I'd still wrap it in a
function to make the meani
11 matches
Mail list logo
