WOW!
thats all I can say.
when Carl S. told about putting c source in rebol... maybe he could look at this and
see if there couldn't be an agreement with the authors which would allow a version of
rebol to be compiled with their download engine directly !!!
or something like that...
-MAx
---
> A browser plug-in would bring a much bigger audience, and personally -
> working for a large, pretty staid, predominantly MS-centric corporation -
I
> think Rebol would need to do OLE Automation to do all the things we want
> (we'd pay for it).
This text was posted by me some time ago (7/7/2000
I'll just add that then, you can create a superclass object and reference that
instead, this way you can replace the internal object at will and keep all references
to it...
Or you can use the no object approach I've explained completely at least twice on the
list... just do a quick search
Robbie:
> The ability to add new variables to objects would be nice - an instant
> alternative to hash! and more elegant.
Take a look at:
http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=extend-an-obje
ct.r
and its documentation -- though bear in mind the limitations: "exten
Thanks for the help everyone, I know you're all very busy just now. I'm
just getting to the level where I should have worked that one out for
myself.
I have some miscellaneous thoughts and findings from my own short journey in
Rebol:
Parse rocks. Unbelievably simple and fast with it. Going
Hi Gregg,
On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 6:24:20 PM, you wrote:
GI> I hope a real VID guru will correct me where I err, but I think FACE
GI> is always going to be the screen-face in an event function.
Ah, right, because that's in the DETECT of the screen face.
(I confess I never use INSERT
