Here's one for the VID gurus. Given the following code (change "Wingdings"
for non-Windows boxen):
stylize/master: [
chk: FACE 24x24 with [
color: white
font: [
name: "Wingdings"
align: 'center
hi Jason
nope, don't know
you could either post and screen scrape a page such as the one
in your example or write your own sunrise function in rebol.
I would not mind writing it but cannot take the time, well ...
for at least a month.
here is the math to write your own
http://www.srrb.noaa.g
I'm not a Java expert, but I assume that there is a formal specification for
Java and that there are many implementations (Sun, IBM, Blackdown?). That
may explain why people would be comfortable adopting Java but not REBOL.
-Karl
On Monday 09 February 2004 19:32, Peter WA Wood wrote:
> I thin
Hi Robert,
--- ""Robert_M._Münch""
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:19:15 + (GMT), Ged Byrne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > What benefits could Rebol/Core gain from cross
> > fertilisation with other open source projects like
> > OCAML and PLTScheme?
>
> I don
Hi
Does anyone know any web service which you can access via Rebol to return
raw data for sunrise, sunset etc.
For example: http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/RS_OneDay.html
But I don't want html, just some params I can set and get via rebol [as
Vanilla dynascript].
Thanks - Jason
--
To unsub
Found this in a series of notes on Perl6.
"...Austin [Hastings] thinks that Perl 6's main 'cultural' impact will be
grammars, arguing that in 10 years time 'getting coders to stop parsing
characters, getting them instead to think, code, and word in terms of "
sentences" or "paragraphs" will be co
>>The product they do sell, such as the SDK or IOS could only benefit from
>>an enhanced
>>core.
>>
>>
>
>No, I don't agree. These can only benefit from higher sales numbers. It's
>a business questions, not a technical one. Robert
>
>
+1 from me. The SDK is an attractive offer, as it all
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:19:15 + (GMT), Ged Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If the code was open source, users would have the
> opportunity to add these features themselves, possibly
> based on the efforts of other open source projects.
Hi, maybe, but I'm mostly sure we will use the homoge
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:03:57 -0600, Joel Neely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With all due respect, I think you're confusing two distinct issues here.
> To paraphrase ESR and RMS, open source is about "free as in free speech,
> not free as in free beer".
Hi, yes I know. BTW: Just to clarify thing
