>> Carl has signed up as a developer for the Zaurus, &
>> will likely be
>> porting View to QT/Embedix (The light weight x-server
>> replacement) ;-)
>>
>
> Doesn't the Zaurus run AmigaDE?
Amiga Inc could only wish ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTEC
.
--
Regards,
Deryk Robosson
Deryk Robosson
22 Flemington St.
Albany, WA 6330 Australia
ABN: 56 728 377 499
PH: +61 0408429835 EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
ltiple authentication
methods across systems where Rebol is concerned (though my rebauthd is still
alive and kicking and can authenticate against slapd just fine through
pam_ldap/nss_ldap), native support for the rest of my directory would be
nice. :)
--
Regards,
Deryk Robosson
Deryk Robosson
22 F
On Monday 08 October 2001 05:30, you wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, Joel. Question 1 is now out of the way. But as
> for Q2, I still am facing some problems.
>
> I actually am parsing HTML, not XML, so I need a method that will
> understand certain things that are illegal in XML. Ex: nobord
On Friday 05 October 2001 14:25, you wrote:
> Not that I'm a great lover of XML but http://www.syncml.org/ details some
> schemas for vCARD etc...
Better yet are the RFCs:
vCard: 2425, 2426
vCal (iCal): 2445, 2446, 2447
Best to build on the framework than from the top down IMO.
--
To unsubscri
Graham Chiu wrote:
>
> Can someone try this out in 1.2 ?
>
> Start up View
> click on Rebol.com
> click on Sites
> Enter any site not your own
> click on console
> type "desktop"
> click on Local
>
> Up pops an error message
>
> "Cannot open folder:
> http://.whateversiteyouclickedon/local
Carl Sassenrath wrote:
>
> A draft of the REBOL Dictionary (all functions of REBOL
> listed in alpha order) is now available in HTML format.
>
> If you like to wait for the net, you can download it from
>http://www.rebol.com/docs/dictionary.html. It's 878 KB.
>
> If you prefer to use REBOL di
Paolo Russo wrote:
>
> >At 15:10 3.5.2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >>See how your country scores in worldwide REBOL interest...
> >>
> >>http://www.rebol.com/sitehits.html
> >
> >Wow.. Is there anything that can't be done with Rebol???
> >(I'm newbie with Rebol, not with computers: C64, Amiga, VMS, ms
Greg Schwarz wrote:
>
> I am asking for some help on telnet.
>
> I am looking at Telnet to get information from an access router. This information is
>about the phone line connection details, customers are getting and store this in a
>data base to be accessed at any time so we can see how ther
Brett Handley wrote:
>
> Ah too easy. Thanks.
> Brett.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Larry Palmiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 8:01 AM
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: need advice on parsing image data
>
> > Hi Brett,
> >
> > >write/binary %t
laplace wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> when uploading several files, rebol connect once for each file ? That's very
> slow: is it possible to avoid that ? thanks.
Via FTP? No, unavoidable (for data connections anyway, control
connections are usually maintained on port 21). It is the nature of the
beast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> unsubscribe messages
>
> Hi,
> I think that Selma should stop to attach the unsubscribe messages to the mails that
>already have it.
> It would save a lot of space...
1) They're not using selma any longer, they are using Listar.
2) You'd be supr
Maarten Koopmans wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> The easiest way is to add a #! (shebang) line to your rebol scripts and
> givethem the extension .cgi
>
> Forgot the httpd.conf trick as well
If you wish to maintain the .r extension instead of the above .cgi
extension, append the following:
AddHandler
Michal Kracik wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> I think that network security is not a problem here. If I remember
> correctly, with C socket library it's possible to listen only on
> a specific interface. So if I listen only on local loopback interface
> 127.0.0.1 and some port, noone from the network c
Jos van Boven wrote:
>
> I downloaded the above-mentioned files, but can't read them.
> As said in the documents:
>
> write %dictionary.html decompress 64#
>
> I get:
> Script error: decompress expected data argument of type: binary.
> Where: write %dictionary.html decompress #4#
>
> note: "64
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip, mention about lockup]
Another way to aid would be to run enforcer, mungwall, and sushi (or
ones other faviorite debugging tools) to aid in the location of the
problem, though having a DEBUG compiled binary would help as well..
Deryk
--
To unsubscribe from this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> ANDREW,
>
> here's a quickly knocked up function to make XML from a block of REBOL values.
>
> Note the value block should contain 'tag 'value 'tag2 'value2 etc etc.
>
> anyway here's the func.
>
> xml-maker: func [ block [block!]] [
>
> if not even? (length? blo
GS Jones wrote:
>
> Hi, Martin,
>
> Here was my quick hack that version that I brewed up yesterday, but I
> hesitated to send it after seeing Kevin's resubmission of Jeff's more
> definitive solution. Today, I'm thinking what the heck, it works, I'll send
> it anyway.
>
> i-buf: make string! 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Howdy, David:
>
> It hasn't been updated since then when we changed the list
> to list-star which broke the rebol.org archiver and we
> haven't found the time to fix that yet. If and when we do
> we'll mass update the archive.
>
> Sterling, myself, and
Reichart wrote:
>
> 1. Q: Unfortunately, it doesn't work yet
> A: I thought you were going to say?"because you misspelled something.
>
> But, hey Cool!
>
> You build the basic structure, I will go gather some PD dictionaries, and
> convert them. We can then submit to Rebol as the keeper o
nop wrote:
>
> Howdy, Deryk:
>
> > When did the mailing list move to Listar? Rebol couldn't cope with
> > the load? :)
>
> REBOL Tech. decided that rather than expend valuable time and energy
> hacking SELMA it would be better to focus on REBOL.
>
> SELMA handled like 50,000 messages i
When did the mailing list move to Listar? Rebol couldn't cope with the
load? :)
12: Received: with LISTAR (v0.129a; list rebol); Fri, 15 Dec 2000
13:02:42 -0800 (PST)
Also, there are a few people sending messages with the Outlook buffer
overrun hack. Most seem to be coming from severus.msprint
Mat Bettinson wrote:
> Assuming for a second that I buy this argument, and I'm really not
> sure I do, then how would you recommend a recursive directory scan be
> implemented in Rebol?
You being The Fingers dare doubt the knowledge of The Holger? tsk ;)
Deryk
--
To unsubscribe from this list
23 matches
Mail list logo
