[REBOL] Re: [series] Series performance was Re: MySQL-protocol.r

2004-01-03 Thread Paul Tretter
This is an excellent table of data. I'm curious what functions you ran to obtain it. Paul Tretter - Original Message - From: "Ashley TrÃter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 12:37 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: [series

[REBOL] Re: [series] Series performance was Re: MySQL-protocol.r

2004-01-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* Ashley Trüter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040102 21:46]: > > Hi Tim, > > > But I believe that lists and blocks are implemented > > differently internally, but I'm ignorant as to how. > > any comments on this? > Hi Ashley: > Conceptually, a block is just a collection of values where the seque

[REBOL] Re: [series] Series performance was Re: MySQL-protocol.r

2004-01-03 Thread Andreas Bolka
Saturday, January 3, 2004, 7:37:04 AM, Ashley wrote: > Operation Block! List! Hash! > == = = = > first / last1,961,614 2,038,423 1,936,023 > pick / poke / at1,844,334504 1,846,456 > find / select (1) 1,546,259

[REBOL] Re: [series] Series performance was Re: MySQL-protocol.r

2004-01-02 Thread Ashley Trüter
Hi Tim, > But I believe that lists and blocks are implemented > differently internally, but I'm ignorant as to how. > any comments on this? Conceptually, a block is just a collection of values where the sequence is directly known (ie. like an "array" REBOL knows where the Nth value is). A l