Hi Brett,
<< I was pointing out that you don't - you could use a batch file or another
program that can start another process - ie call View with command line
argument. >>
Ahh, yes. I was thinking inside the box. :)
<< Just thinking about it. Another thing that could be done is to modify the
us
> << I just want to draw out of your example that you can start View using a
> command line switch to specify a specific script. So
> one does not need View/Pro to start a specific script as long as you have
> something that can call other programs. >>
>
> Sorry, I'm in some kind of fog here. This
Hi Brett,
<< I just want to draw out of your example that you can start View using a
command line switch to specify a specific script. So
one does not need View/Pro to start a specific script as long as you have
something that can call other programs. >>
Sorry, I'm in some kind of fog here. This
Hi Gregg,
Nice demo. I was chuffed to see vid-notes mentioned too :^)
I just want to draw out of your example that you can start View using a
command line switch to specify a specific script. So
one does not need View/Pro to start a specific script as long as you have
something that can call oth
Eheh. I dropped a cruicial change before posting.
run-script: function [url] [file] [
if exists? file: path-thru url [
replace/all file " " "%20"
call probe rejoin [rebol-exe " " to-local-file file]
]
]
Sorry to distract from the essential point being that one can have a
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 11:41:23 +0100
"Cyphre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> try: do http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/resize.r
>
> This is just a result of 2 hours of experimenting. But I
> want to improve it
> in the near future...
> Simmilar(and better) resize handler should be implemented
> in the
Hi Joanna,
<< One more thing on View. How easy it's reconfigure View so that it can be
only used to start these premade scripts we provide... I'm looking for easy
launchpad for end-users. They have no interest on programming and too many
options can be confusing and get into way. >>
It's easy en
From: "Adrian"
> How do you view the "View" part of the
> page? I was unable to run it inside of View.
Hi, Adrian,
If you start-up REBOL/View in the Desktop mode, then click the console icon.
Then type the following line, including the word "do".
do http://www.midwestgypsy.com/hello.html
If yo
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:43:18 -0600
"G. Scott Jones" ... wrote:
...
> > BTW isn't awfully early in the morning in your neck of
> > the woods?
From: "Graham Chiu"
> Insomnia again :(
Bummer.
--Scott Jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc
Hi Graham,
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Chiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:13 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Community (was IOS).
It would be very nice if layouts automatically resized
> correctly by themse
At 16:49 19.3.2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Joanna,
>
><< I could use it if there were free (or very cheap) and easy to install
>runtime for my View.programs. Last time I checked there was none. >>
>
>For non-commercial use, you can use View (not View/Pro), can't you?
My problem is, those View.based
At 08:07 21.3.2002 +1200, you wrote:
> > Encapped scripts are not cross-platform though, right?
> > And don't our
> > nice tiny little scripts suddenly grow into 400k+
> > band-width using
> > monsters?
>
>One of the points was to make it easy to run a script
>without having to install the interpr
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:43:18 -0600
"G. Scott Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That does seem like it would be useful at times. I could
> envision a "table"
> style being similar to the "list" style, with some sort
> of supply
> definition, or something, for the fields. I wish I had
> time t
How do you view the "View" part of the page? I was unable to run it inside
of View.
Adrian
- Original Message -
From: G. Scott Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:43 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Community (was IOS).
From: "Graham Chiu"
...
> I have embedded Vid code in my home page which is hidden
> within ... tags, and only displayable by
> a View program. The web server (Zope) dynamically serves up
> HTML and VID on the same page.
...
For those desiring "direct links" in email:
http://www.compkarori.co
>
>
> Hello, World!
>
>
>
Hi Scott,
I was looking at something similar early last year when I
was writing Vidwiki.
I have embedded Vid code in my home page which is hidden
within ... tags, and only displayable by
a View program. The web server (Zope) dynamically serves up
HTML and VID o
> Encapped scripts are not cross-platform though, right?
> And don't our
> nice tiny little scripts suddenly grow into 400k+
> band-width using
> monsters?
One of the points was to make it easy to run a script
without having to install the interpreter separately.
One would provide the encapped W
"Porter Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about making index.r files visible to search engines? Depending on how
> much control over your web server you have, it could be easy to serve
> index.r as the default for directories. Apache and IIS make this a
> relatively trivial process. J
From: "Porter Woodward"
> All -
>
> what about making index.r files visible to search engines? Depending on
how
> much control over your web server you have, it could be easy to serve
> index.r as the default for directories. Apache and IIS make this a
> relatively trivial process. Just setup t
All -
what about making index.r files visible to search engines? Depending on how
much control over your web server you have, it could be easy to serve
index.r as the default for directories. Apache and IIS make this a
relatively trivial process. Just setup the server to serve index.r,
index.h
On 20-Mar-02, Graham Chiu wrote:
>> I could use it if there were free (or very cheap) and
>> easy to install
>> runtime for my View.programs. Last time I checked there
>> was none.
> As I and others have mentioned, perhaps RT should look at a
> mechanism for freely encaping freeware View reblet
yes I know, 6 * 7, exactly ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Gregg Irwin
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Community (was IOS).
<< "Rebol tutorial" - 42
42? Yes,
On Tuesday 19 March 2002 00:29, you wrote:
> << "Rebol tutorial" - 42
>
> 42? Yes, 42. >>
>
> 42!! OK, don't anybody write ANY MORE tutorials for REBOL! (all you Douglas
> Adams fans out there know what I'm talking about. :)
>
Exactly! SO REBOL IS THE ANSWER. And we worship in silence
--Maa
> I could use it if there were free (or very cheap) and
> easy to install
> runtime for my View.programs. Last time I checked there
> was none.
As I and others have mentioned, perhaps RT should look at a
mechanism for freely encaping freeware View reblets to help
spread the message.
--
Graham C
> java sux 16,600
> perl sux 14,300
> php sux 33,400
> c++ sux 4,620
> rebol sux 157
I played this game for little while yesterday too - using keys such as
'bugs', 'docs', 'help', 'crash', 'fun', 'how-to', etc. If well correlated,
it _might_ really reveal something interesting, but probably about
Hi Joanna,
<< I could use it if there were free (or very cheap) and easy to install
runtime for my View.programs. Last time I checked there was none. >>
For non-commercial use, you can use View (not View/Pro), can't you?
--Gregg
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL
>
>People like free.
Some things in life are worth paying for.. But not all.
>Personally I would've prefered RT to be selling developers' versions
>of REBOL with "player" versions for free, (no Console and help and
>stuff perhaps), but I acknowledge REBOL's a very hard language to
>work out ho
Also from Cnet downloads...
Perl2.exe 3.08
Convert Perl scripts to EXE files.
License: Shareware
Downloads...31,521
- Original Message -
From: "Carl Read" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:50 AM
Subject: [REBOL]
Graham Chiu wrote:
> This is fun ...
>
> java bug 842,000
> perl bug 579,000
> php bug 1,090,000
> C++ bug 497,000
> rebol bug 5,090
>
My research also backed up this trend..
java sux 16,600
perl sux 14,300
php sux 33,400
c++ sux 4,620
rebol sux 157
So based on bugs and overall suckiness we sh
Hi, Gregg,
All the mice at my house are laughing hysterically...
Gregg Irwin wrote:
>
> << "Rebol tutorial" - 42
>
> 42? Yes, 42. >>
>
> 42!! OK, don't anybody write ANY MORE tutorials for REBOL! (all you Douglas
> Adams fans out there know what I'm talking about. :)
>
--
; Joel Neely
Hmm,
but if you take those numbers and use them like so:
Java Bugs 842,000 / Java Tutorial 81,600 = 10.32
Rebol Bugs 5,090 / Rebol Tutorial 42 = 121.19
This may not mean any thing - and certainly isn't meant to imply that there
are an average of 10.32 bugs per tutorial. But it does give a pre
If you enclose "rebol bug" in quotes for the boolean effect, you get 6.
TB
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Chiu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:46 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Community (was IOS).
> On Mon,
Graham Chiu wrote:
>
> This is fun ...
>
> java bug 842,000
Looks like google can't get access to the java developer connection,
according to Sun's bug tracker that should actually be something like
(make sure you are sitting down before reading ahead)
4652671 bugs reported (as of 10:30 toda
* Terry Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020318 13:55]:
> Here's a quote from the second article from Jason's IOS post...
> "According to Sassenrath, another complaint he hears often is that REBOL
> isn't open source. The scripts are open source, but the system itself is
> not. Sassenrath says that t
On 19-Mar-02, Terry Brownell wrote:
> So, if RT is going to just concentrate on apps, then why not offer
> Pro and command for free? Of course, if View/Pro/Command is making
> ANY decent money at all, then forget it, but if not, why not. I
> don't see Rebol growing too quickly given all the optio
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:47:17 -0800
Terry Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Java tutorial" - 81,600
> "PHP tutorial" - 9,940
> "C++ tutorial" - 9,820
> "Perl tutorial" - 13,600
> "Rebol tutorial" - 42
This is fun ...
java bug 842,000
perl bug 579,000
php bug 1,090,000
C++ bug 497,000
reb
<< "Rebol tutorial" - 42
42? Yes, 42. >>
42!! OK, don't anybody write ANY MORE tutorials for REBOL! (all you Douglas
Adams fans out there know what I'm talking about. :)
--Gregg
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, w
37 matches
Mail list logo
