you and email you the details in about 12
>hours when I get back from work (I'm in Malaysia - GMT+8)
>
>Nick.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>GS Jones
>Sent: 20 April 2001 02:33
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] Re: SMTP authentication - the answer - but another
question
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
> authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
> surely there is standardisation of sorts
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:54:42PM +0800, Nick Kitson wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
> both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
> authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
Hi Scott,
I'm now confused again - my Outlook (12/98) & Outlook Express (4/99) have
both implemented SMTP authentication and work successfully with my
authenticating servers. MS are not known to lead the pack in this area so
surely there is standardisation of sorts, (even if it is MS sorts)
Nic
Heya GS,
GJ> Like you, I'm surprised that more services haven't initiated SMTP
GJ> authentication at least to some level.
Ahem, no one has yet introduced a proper binary transport system for
E-mail yet other than encoding in base-86 to hack into a 7-bit
character set.
Same is true of Usenet. So
From: "Nick Kitson"
> Hi Scott and Brett,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions - I took it to 'feedback' and got -
>
> > "REBOL does not currently support SMTP authorization though your request
> has been added to our protocol enhancement list.
>
> > If you can't possibly wait, the SMTP protocol in REB
