[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: Viewing two or more copies of the same layout.
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> > A browser plug-in would bring a much bigger audience, and
> personally -
> > working for a large, pretty staid, predominantly MS-centric
> corporation -
>
> A browser plug-in would bring a much bigger audience, and personally -
> working for a large, pretty staid, predominantly MS-centric corporation -
I
> think Rebol would need to do OLE Automation to do all the things we want
> (we'd pay for it).
This text was posted by me some time ago (7/7/2000
it finds a matching word.
HTH !
-MAx
---
PS: This was intended for the newcommers, Sorry if its redundent for you.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
Robbie:
> The ability to add new variables to objects would be nice - an instant
> alternative to hash! and more elegant.
Take a look at:
http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?script=extend-an-obje
ct.r
and its documentation -- though bear in mind the limitations: "exten
Thanks for the help everyone, I know you're all very busy just now. I'm
just getting to the level where I should have worked that one out for
myself.
I have some miscellaneous thoughts and findings from my own short journey in
Rebol:
Parse rocks. Unbelievably simple and fast with it. Going
Hi Robbie,
To explain Gabriele's suggestion a bit...
The idea is that you store the layout spec block in your object, so
it's just a block of data, not a face yet. The call to LAYOUT, which
creates the face, is deferred until you need to view it.
It might be a bit much if you're new to REBOL, b
Hi Robbie,
On Tuesday, February 10, 2004, 4:59:49 AM, you wrote:
RA> patient-record: context [
RA> id: none
RA> f1: none
RA> lyt: layout [
RA> across
RA> text "Name"
RA> f1: field
RA> return
RA> btn-enter "Save" [; save record to database for
At present you are making two objects (via context) which both share the
same layout face (a face is an object too) - sub-objects are not cloned
during Make - they are referenced/shared. A source of much debate :-)
>> a: context [o: context [name: "brett"]]
>> b: make a []
>> b/o/name
== "brett"
