[REBOL] Re: differences between script output and typing with tcp port

2004-04-07 Thread sags
Thanks for answers! The approach to find dot in multiline responses, I found already before. That script was not so much intended to be as real script for POP operations, rather than something to start "Rebol" feeling about TCP. In this case I wanted to find out - how to detect end of response

[REBOL] Re: differences between script output and typing with tcp port

2004-04-05 Thread Jones, Scott
=== On 5 Apr 2004 at 23:06, Anton Rolls wrote: I think don't use /no-wait. (You also might not need to use wait myPop, then ...) Just a quick suggestion. The difference between console typing session and script is: the script doesn't pause in between... === From: Janeks I experimented with wai

[REBOL] Re: differences between script output and typing with tcp port

2004-04-05 Thread SunandaDH
Janeks: > It looks like that I shoul upgrade my study PC to > continue time effective Rebol studies. Is it possible that the CGI is taking longer than a user-settable timeout under Abyss? (I've never used Abyss, but I see a similar problem with Xitami for programs that take over 1 minute to

[REBOL] Re: differences between script output and typing with tcp port

2004-04-05 Thread sags
I experimented with wait / nowait - it is not a reason. It seems for me that reason is platform dependent or mail server dependent. The example I decribed in previous mesage I got on an very old PC with Win95 4.00.950 B (processor 175 mhz) ;-) with MSIE 4.0 and freeware servers: web - Abyss

[REBOL] Re: differences between script output and typing with tcp port

2004-04-05 Thread Anton Rolls
I think don't use /no-wait. (You also might not need to use wait myPop, then ...) Just a quick suggestion. The difference between console typing session and script is: the script doesn't pause in between... Anton. > newbie q: > > why there is differencies > f.ex. script: > > [ > REBOL [Title: