. And I agree with you
- Natasha would be preferable. Cheers Tim-Original
Message-
From: Frac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 02, 1999 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Meg Howard
>Dear Tim,
>
>Don't take this w
k that what she said
supports the sort of implications I was drawing - at least prima facie.
Anyway, I guess she can prove me wrong over the next few years by the way she
uses the balance of power in the Senate.
And I agree with you - Natasha would be preferable.
Cheers
Tim
Dear Tim,
Don't take this wrong now, but I think you've taken Meg Lees' comments out
of context, and the text doesn't support your implications. I'm not a Lees
fan; 'Tasha's my kind of gal, but I believe we hurt our cause more than help
it by falling into the same trap of misrepresentation as do
Meg Lees makes some Interesting comments in the article below
(reproduced from the newsclips):
Senator Lees said "it is through tax that we get messages
across about how we would like people to behave".Don't think Howard could have put it better himself! Seems they
both like to tell us "ho
