Hi Jake,
Glad it is working now, and thank you for the extra information.
This is what I suspect.
The user account you used could have multiple login sessions.
You logged in, had the page open in smartedit or selected in smarttree,
hence locking the page.
You closed your window.
You logged in
Hi guys,
I just built the following site in MS 10.
http://media.smashingmagazine.com/cdn_smash/wp-content/uploads/images/smashing-html5/files/index.html
JS and CSS are managed in MS 10 as well.
I experienced no problem in IE 8 nor in Firefox 4, in SmartEdit, Page
Preview and Publish.
If there a
Hi Jian,
Thanks for joining the thread.
I did review the source code and the anchor tags were missing. Also we
have "hide unauthorized reddots" checked.
Lastly, I was logged in as administrator.
I was able to recreate the page, and the dots worked on that page, so
I have moved on. I am certainl
Hi,
In SmartEdit, press CTRL, right click on page, view source in content
menu/
Find reddot in source code, does MS generate around the reddot
image?
Also, in SmartEdit mode, hoever over reddot, what does the alt text
say?
What is your project setting regarding "Hide unauthorized RedDots "
-J
No. I may have edited template code, but when I made a duplicate of
the page, the Dots worked in that page. I looked at the CSS after
doing a little digging in case there was a zIndex problem, but there
was not.
On Apr 29, 3:27 am, Vigor wrote:
> Are you using any scripts or Flash in that page
Hi Dmitry,
Thank you [?] for your guidance.
Since my application page has huge Footer, so it is very difficult for me to
use this approach [?].
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Dmitry Terner wrote:
> Exactly what I am experiencing.. so what I had to do is not pretty but it
> works. Here is an
Are you using any scripts or Flash in that page?
Regards
Ralf
On 28 Apr., 22:11, "Jake@Peel" wrote:
> I've made a new page and the Dots are clickable on that new page using
> the same content and classes. Any thoughts? Same user (admin) as well.
>
> On Apr 28, 2:44 pm, "Jake@Peel" wrote:
>
>
>
