On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Chris Garrigues wrote:
I just tried to install the perl 5.6 from rawhide (I'm still ever so slowly
downloading real redhat-7.0) and got the following errors:
# rpm -Uvh perl-5.6.0-9.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
perl = 5.00503 is needed by
From: Pekka Savola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 20:30:19 +0300 (EEST)
Perl from 7.0 shows the same behaviour. This has been reported, and
AFAIR, is harmless.
Well, except that the script that I wrote to install RPMs everywhere doesn't
use --nodeps, and I'm not at all
To be able to run some (old) applications on redhat 7.0
(for axample matlab) the libc-5 support is still needed.
I just added the RH 6.2 libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm and
ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm packages on the PC.
Question: apparently there is no incompatibility with these
rpms so why are they not
The kernel compile problem remains from kernel-2.2.16-21. With
xforms-devel-0.88-15 from powertools installed the kernel build tries
to use the _no source_ library xforms!! With another version of
xforms (0.88.1-1) installed the unresolved references in libxforms.so
disappear, but not the
Hi,
I am trying to use the latest STL libraries from SGI (version 3.3)
with RH 6.1 and gcc (g++). I'm getting illegal token errors in a
couple of the headers, and it appears to be the '/' character used
to indicate a continuing line in several #if defined
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Anne POSSOZ wrote:
Question: apparently there is no incompatibility with these
rpms so why are they not provided together with redhat 7?
Because we can't keep compatibility with obsolete stuff forever.
If we wanted to remain compatible with any obsolete stuff we ever
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 07:39:31PM +0200, Anne POSSOZ wrote:
Question: apparently there is no incompatibility with these
rpms so why are they not provided together with redhat 7?
And it seems to fully solve the problem.
In the 6.2 RELEASE-NOTES:
Deprecated features and packages -- The
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Pekka Savola wrote:
Hopefully this will also encourage Wolfram Research to make a newer
version of Matlab available too..
Minor correction: Wolfram Research develops _Mathematica_ not
Matlab. But the point still stands :-)
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of
The support for old stuff has to be dropped at some point; usually extra
I think this is more than a bit early. Not everyone wants to recompile
programs that work perfectly well as they are.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Anne POSSOZ wrote:
To be able to run some (old) applications on redhat 7.0
(for axample matlab) the libc-5 support is still needed.
I just added the RH 6.2 libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm and
ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm packages on the
10 matches
Mail list logo
