what is the real size of setup.S (the code for booting on i386)

2001-04-11 Thread huxinnian
what is the real size of setup.S (the code for booting on i386)?? 4 sectors Some one says ,it will be changed when using build tools?? Is it ?? Thank you ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Symbolic Link question

2001-04-11 Thread Christopher Harrer
Hello All, I have a windows share mounted on my Linux development system via 'mount -t smbfs...'. Is it possible to create symbolic links to files under that share and if so how do I do it? I'm currently trying to do the following, without success: ln -sf /usr/src/cvstree/test.c

Re: Symbolic Link question

2001-04-11 Thread Pete Peterson
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 11 10:38:42 2001 From: "Christopher Harrer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Symbolic Link question Hello All, I have a windows share mounted on my Linux development system via 'mount -t smbfs...'. Is it possible to create symbolic

Re: Symbolic Link question

2001-04-11 Thread Jean Francois Martinez
Christopher Harrer a crit : Hello All, I have a windows share mounted on my Linux development system via 'mount -t smbfs...'. Is it possible to create symbolic links to files under that share and if so how do I do it? I'm currently trying to do the following, without success: ln -sf

Re: Symbolic Link question

2001-04-11 Thread Christopher Harrer
Hi Pete, Sorry, I left that step out. You're assumption are right... /usr/src/cvstree is on the Windows system and /home/chris is on my linux system. Thanks for the answer. I'm sure I just have some other type of configuration issue. Thanks! Chris From: "Pete Peterson" [EMAIL

Re: Symbolic Link question

2001-04-11 Thread Christopher Harrer
Hi Jean Francois, Your assumptions are correct. Thanks for the response. Sorry about the signature, I don't usually use this email account and I didn't even look (although even if I did look, I don't think I could've changed it anyway as it think it gets appended after I send a message) :)

How can I get all the process ID # that are current running in C?

2001-04-11 Thread Liu, Guangsheng
Hi, What C function can I use to get all the process ID numbers that are current running in Linux? Thanks. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

RedHat without X at all

2001-04-11 Thread David Collantes
Dear all, I recently downloaded "Wolverine" and I found myself troubled trying to install all the programs I needed *without* installing any X application at all. This does not only applies to Wolverine (which is a beta), but to previous releases. I do not use X (nor XFree, Gnome, nor KDE,

How to rebuild tcltk.src.rpm ??

2001-04-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
Can anyone tell me how to rebuild tcltk source rpm? Every time I try this, I got at the end, after very long compilation: preprocessing tclsh.1tcl/intro/tclsh Begin building help tree scanning bldmanhelp.tmp creating help file tcl/intro/syntax creating help file

Re: How can I get all the process ID # that are current running in C?

2001-04-11 Thread Emmanuel Galanos
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:43:46AM -0400, Liu, Guangsheng wrote: Hi, What C function can I use to get all the process ID numbers that are current running in Linux? scandir(3) or opendir(3);readdir(3) or popen("ps -e|cut -d' ' -f1", "r") emmanuel

Re: Anaconda and kickstart.

2001-04-11 Thread Vilius Puidokas
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Chris Petro wrote: Go back and re-read what I wrote. That doesn't do it. Using the comps file allows you to choose *different* packages for install, but must be specified in the ks.config file. What I am going to acheive is the ability to