What is the reason there are no glibc...athlon.rpm packages in 7.3?
When upgrading glibc on an AthlonXP machine, what are the packages
reccomended to install (i386? i686?)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
I am am receiving an error return value from a module that I have
written however the return code is not one I have define, nor is it none
from errno.h (numbers 0 to 124) nor 126 or 127. Signals.h does not also
have values that high (0 to 31) when added to128 as reported by bash.
The return value
Florian, Eric,
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > ... but sure you knew all that and if this was not
> > your point it would be more helpful if you would
> > come out and explain in little more detail what's
> > going on and what you are after, please.
>
> The BuildRequires are _al
> ... but sure you knew all that and if this was not
> your point it would be more helpful if you would
> come out and explain in little more detail what's
> going on and what you are after, please.
The BuildRequires are _all_ being looked at, "ifarch" or other tries
to limit them to special case
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Erik Troan wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Jul 2002, Riku Meskanen wrote:
>
> > Ok, how about?
> >
> > %ifarch i386
> > BuildRequires: dietlibc
> > %endif
>
> There is only one source RPM for all platforms -- this won't do what
> you want.
>
Eric, however amazing it may appear I knew alre
