Re: If package is not installed at installation time

2003-03-13 Thread John
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Don Dade wrote: > Why is it that list Nazis never understand that if it is s bad to post > an off-topic message, it is equally bad to reply to it and double the amount > of off topic messages? He, like you, needs education. People are on this list to discuss developmen

Re: If package is not installed at installation time

2003-03-13 Thread Don Dade
Why is it that list Nazis never understand that if it is s bad to post an off-topic message, it is equally bad to reply to it and double the amount of off topic messages? Give the guy a frickin' break and help him, why don't you, or just don't reply at all. And RTFM? That's just plain ru

Re: CDE devkit for Redhat

2003-03-13 Thread Thomas Dodd
John wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote: CDE is not free in any sense. Red Hat sold a version at one time, back around RHL-5.x. currently XiG sells DeXtop v3.0 for $50 RH quite when it found CDE was broken and RH couldn't fix it. It even offered users a rebate on their next purchas

Re: If package is not installed at installation time

2003-03-13 Thread John
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Ajay Bansal wrote: > How can I add it later. > > For the time being: requirement is to add ftp server support to RH box.. 1. Read the RH documentation. It answers this question and many more. 2. This is not a devleopmentissue in any sense, and there are better lists for it.

Re: CDE devkit for Redhat

2003-03-13 Thread John
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote: > > > Vijeth Bhat wrote: > > Hi all, > > Is there a CDE devkit available on Red Hat ? If so, > > Does it get installed with the standard distribution ? > > I am using 7.2 and I did not find the diretories > > /usr/dt /usr/dt/lib etc., as found in solaris

Re: GTK+ or QT ???

2003-03-13 Thread John
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Thomas Dodd wrote: > > > John wrote: > > My own bias favours KDE over Gnome because > > . I believe C++ a better programming language for this kind of work > > than C. It does more to help programmers avoid silly errors such as > > buffer overruns. > > Are the C++ bindings

RE: GTK+ or QT ???

2003-03-13 Thread Rokicki, Andrew
I am no expert with this, but I did some testing with GTK+ and QT and found out that GTK+ was more pthread(native kernel threads) friendly than QT. I could be wrong I only did some preliminary testing/evaluation. On Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:29 PM, Thomas Dodd [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: If package is not installed at installation time

2003-03-13 Thread Joseph Tate
You'll get a better response if you choose the proper mailing list to send the question to. Check for a LUG (Linux Users' Group) in your area. If you can't find one, join the mailing list for the version you are using: https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo. Joseph Ajay Bansal wrote: H

If package is not installed at installation time

2003-03-13 Thread Ajay Bansal
How can I add it later. For the time being: requirement is to add ftp server support to RH box.. .. TIA -Ajay ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

Re: CDE devkit for Redhat

2003-03-13 Thread Thomas Dodd
Vijeth Bhat wrote: Hi all, Is there a CDE devkit available on Red Hat ? If so, Does it get installed with the standard distribution ? I am using 7.2 and I did not find the diretories /usr/dt /usr/dt/lib etc., as found in solaris / hpux ? CDE is not free in any sense. Red Hat sold a version at o

Re: GTK+ or QT ???

2003-03-13 Thread Thomas Dodd
John wrote: My own bias favours KDE over Gnome because . I believe C++ a better programming language for this kind of work than C. It does more to help programmers avoid silly errors such as buffer overruns. Are the C++ bindings for gnome? I know GTK+ has GTK--. . I think the recent move in Gn