On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:59:19AM +0530, Ajay Bansal wrote:
> Don't have man page for prelink
Then you need to install that package. :-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://esm.logic.net/
Felix qui potuit rerum cog
tance or asking inane questions (like, "I just saw the
Fast and the Furious, and I'm gonna make my car run 10s! How do I do
that?"), they'll be told to sod off and go hire a shop to do the work,
since they're not going to get far on their own.
It's not just the
control device
SYNOPSIS
#include
int ioctl(int d, int request, ...);
[...snip...]
Hope this helps.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://esm.logic.net/
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
___
Redhat-devel-list maili
Hi,
The glint package in the updates directory for Red Hat 5.2 is incorrect;
it requires a version of rpm < 3.0, and thus cannot be used with rpm 3.0.5
included in the updates.
(Yes, I actually do have a 5.2 machine in production. ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PRO
b/redhat/updates/6.1/sparcv9/glibc-2.1.3-22.sparcv9.rpm
Someone forget a mkdir before that cp? ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
__
licit check for %{glibcrelease}.2.4 could be added for
glibc-common. Or you could create a glibc24. (Or, glibc-common could be
built when kernel24 is set Ick. ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> I was going to put it in the contrib directory of the FTP server.
> However I cannot find any information on how to do this.
Upload it to ftp://incoming.redhat.com/libc[56]/ .
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anyone at RedHat listening? Sounds like a few minutes' hack to distract
someone over there between kernel builds...;-)
(Seeing that I'm doing a nightly rsync of it anyway, maybe I should get
off my lazy butt and do it myself...;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
since there's no debugging
information in the executable; has Red Hat considered building rawhide
releases with "-g" so that better debugging information can be reported
(at least in the initial few weeks of development, and then removing that
as you get closer to a release, so that o
0.43.4
And then add the following line to the appropriate image stanza of
lilo.conf:
initrd = /boot/initrd-2.4.0-0.43.4.img
(Yes, I found this out the hard way. Live and learn. ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
ht
Hi,
Looks like kernel24-2.4.0-0.43.4.src.rpm didn't appear in SRPMS for this
week's update...or am I missing something? :-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
f BSD/OS releases, an older version of
Digital UNIX/Tru64, and a half-dozen odd little obscure platforms. Cross-
platform compatibility is like the holy grail in a place like this, and
any litle effort to help with that, including fighting off feature creep
on core elements, makes my job MUCH easier.)
--
nch. *hint, hint*
> based off the 2.2.17-4 SRPM.
Hrm? Where'd you locate that? I'm starting out from the 2.2.16-22 SRPM,
and having something a little more modern would have been MUCH less
painful...
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Adminis
f Alan's updates,
I'd rather use that, personally. ;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing l
Hi,
Anyone else seeing problems with XFree86 4.0.1-1.1 from Raw Hide 20001024
dumping core at startup? I've attached the relevant log below, followed
by the gdb output.
Any suggestions for a workaround? (Yes, I'm falling back to the XFree86
release from guinness for now. ;-)
--
ase of GCC,
rather than the release deemed stable by it's own developers?
I think a few people had been hoping that gcc 2.96 slipped in there by
accident from Raw Hide, and wasn't an intentional choice.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administra
16 and 2.4.0-test5 both die compiling them.
Use "kgcc" (as part of the kgcc package) to build the kernel; GCC 2.96 is
incapable of building 2.2.x right now.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/
substitute it in here? Just a thought.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Steven Lord wrote:
> I'm going to have to set up a machine to monitor bandwidth use and ethernet
> packets.
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.
On 30 Jun 2000, Brian Lalor wrote:
> Oh, please. Suck it up. We're talking mailing lists, not matters of
> national security, here... :-)
Maybe I should have made the ;-) at the end of the post a little
larger?
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX A
AIL PROTECTED]
Information Technologies
Red Hat Inc.
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, US
;-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Merca
one, and that
Reply-To: remain un-munged, with Mail-Reply-To: being used from DJB's
proposal above.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
_
a header or two that never changes
for every message).
There, now you've got your mailing lists separated in to individual
folders, and no longer need subject mangling.
Next? :-)
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal
subfolders But
I haven't set up any kind of content mangling (if Pine is even capable of
doing it), and would rather not get into it for one list (this one).
So, let me put in my vote: PLEASE get rid of that annoying subject
mangling.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
>
> http://home.xnet.com/~emarshal/rpm/
>
> If you're brave, go ahead and give them a try; as soon as I've had a
> chance to test them, I'll let everyone know.
Just as an FYI, the upgrade went semi-smoo
ot;-2" RPM overrides it later) to incoming.redhat.com, so hopefully that
will show up shortly in contrib.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX Administrator
http://www.nyx.net/~emarshal/ Mercantec, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
without all the building features
integrated...
--
Edward S. Marshall emarshal at xnet.com http://www.xnet.com/~emarshal/
---
Senior Systems Engineer, XNet/Winstar BOFH, UNIX admin, Linux advocate
--
To unsu
ith the EAPI patches), but it's a red herring; even Allaire is
shipping enough source with their ColdFusion module now to facilitate
relinking it in the event of a slight API modification.
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTEC
your own fault, obviously), and since you've
probably had to patch a couple of those (and GPG at the very least
isn't available from Red Hat in a non-restricted form), isn't this a
violation of the letter of the GPL? I'm not a lawyer, though, and this
is t
, but perhaps I
overlooked it)?
--
Edward S. Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>--HappyFunSystemAdministrator(tm)
Do not taunt HappyFunSystemAdministrator(tm).
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> Lilo still comes up via the normal console (the keyboard is disconnected
> at this point, but I'd prefer to leave a video card in there as a "just in
> case"); it's completely uncontrollable from the serial console.
31 matches
Mail list logo
