ist to ask.)
bye
--
Martin Mačok http://underground.cz/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
xfiles.sh"
that contains:
echo "4096" > /proc/sys/kernel/file-max
echo "12288" > /proc/sys/kernel/inode-max
Then, I made a symlink to it from /etc/rcS.d/S37setmaxfiles.sh so
that it will update the kernel structures every time it
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:38:06PM +0100, Levente Farkas wrote:
> :-)) so a simple question: is it possible to compile postfix with
> openssl-0.9.6b-8?
Yes. Get
http://www.ea4els.ampr.org/~sjmudd/postfix/ftp/SRPMS/postfix-20010228_pl06release-1.src.rpm
and rebuild it.
% rpm -q --requires postfi
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 03:06:14PM +0100, Levente Farkas wrote:
> error: failed dependencies:
> libcrypto.so.1 is needed by postfix-20011008-1pcreSASL
> libssl.so.1 is needed by postfix-20011008-1pcreSASL
> # rpm -q --provides openssl
> libcrypto.so.2
> libssl.so.2
> openssl =
On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:26:38PM -0500, Step 1 B wrote:
> Cant this be done during compilation(ie., kernel building) itself so
> that I get a smaller kernel and a smaller set of modules on my disk
> ? Or is just that the current kernel compilation framework does not
> support this ?
Kernel run
20 13:51:47 flower insmod:
> /lib/modules/2.4.9-6/kernel/drivers/sound/emu10k1/emu10k1.o: insmod
> sound-slot-0 failed)
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53803
--
Martin Mačok
underground.cz
openbsd.cz
___
Redhat
searched through their mailing list archives and couldn't find anything
closer. Does anyone here have a clue what's the problem? Is it a real
bug in rh's gcc or "just" some incompatibility?
Thanks and have a nice day
--
Martin Mačok
underground.cz
openbs
