Matt Nelson wrote:
>
> i am fully aware that some people choose to upgrade via `rpm -Uvh --nodeps
> --force *.rpm' but i'm not 100% convinced that this is a safe procedure.
> besides, whether or not this works is completely irrelevent to my original
> statement.
Could a Red Hat Person please tel
Anne POSSOZ wrote:
>
> Since some days there is a new update for redhat-6.0:
> updates/6.0/images/i386/install2
>
> Am I suppose to replace it in RedHat/instimage/usr/bin?
>
> Is there a place with comment about diffrences? What is changed
> since may 29?
not sure - but I'd certainly appreciat
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> is this rpm needed for the installation?
>
> I removed it and get errors on trying to install?
>
> Kevin
>
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
It's what the initscripts use to determine which version of RedHat is
installed, AFAI
Adrian Likins wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 01:16:01PM +0100, Matt Gumbley wrote:
> >
> > Question: Does Lorax differ vastly from the RH 6.0 Way?
> >
> Yes and no. trees/ is pretty similar to 6.0, but /misc/src/install and
> /misc/src/installinit are g
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> Matt Gumbley and others wrote:
>
> > Kevin,
> > I've been following your thread on redhat-devel re: updboots, lack of
> > documentation - could you point me to the howto you said you were
> > writing?
>
> I ha
I wanted to download all of the RH6.0 Errata web pages, for offline
browsing while doing upgrades (and burning onto my upgrade files CDROM),
so I wrote the following quick hack, which someone might find useful.
http://www.gumbley.demon.co.uk/errata-stripper.pl
You'll need a bunch of errata HTML
