, or what I am doing wrong. I am using RPM
> 3.0.5, and upgrading RPM is not really an option for the target systems.
>
> Clues? The error doesn't seem to affect anything - just makes users
> nervous.
Looks like minor database screwage. Run "rpm --rebuilddb" and
e like under Linux/Unix. There you will find code accessing
e.g. scanners over the generic SCSI devices and code handling digital
imaging equipment (or what ever you may call this stuff).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / +49.711.96437.250 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat GmbH / Hauptstätter
ness of
a program and its license at all. Those properties of a program are
totally orthogonal to each other (try to prove the opposite).
Counter examples:
enlightenment (which has some BSD or MIT license) -- not really slim
XFree86 (MIT) -- not (cough) slim
efax (GPL) -- really slim, I haven't h
Or your ISP needs to take
> their head out of their ass.
No. I think it is the traceroute shipped being confused about which source
address to use.
Check http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21095 for more
information on that.
For the record: I think this behaviour qualifies as a
inux
> acceptance now do we? I mean, what exactly is a "Postgre"
> anyways? Not a sense of one-ness like MySQL provides, thats for
> sure!
Well, if you take the correct pronounciation of SQL into account
('sequel'), it sounds like 'Postgres-Sequel' which just
ore reaching the page of the book where he is told how to alias
> root and why he should do it. That is why the MTA should not accept
> to deliver to root: root has no business reading mail
That is your opinion, not everyone else agrees, use the alias and let's
settle this thread.
>
suggests you peruse it first;-)
Nothing :-) Pine doesn't (want to) know what to do with "active" content.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / +49.711.96437.250 / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat GmbH / Hauptstätter Straße 58 / D70178 Stuttgart
The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its
interpret it as a
script (by using a stupid MUA), then that's _my_ fault, not sendmail's.
Some people might want to read mail addressed to root as the root user and
with a sensible MUA, that's _no_ problem. I wouldn't want to stand in
their way.
Nils
--
Nils Philipps
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Steve Dixon wrote:
> is there a way to turn the console frame buffer off instead of having to
> recompile the kernel?
Put "vga=normal" or "vga=ext" into /etc/lilo.conf and re-lilo.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Berliner Straße 39 / D-71229 Leonberg
t; --- .forward ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- 8< ---
Sendmail notices that the last line is the local address and does a copy
but forwards it, too.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Berliner Straße 39 / D-71229 Leonberg // +49.7152.209647
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTEC
E
programs. It's just coincidence that the wrapper is a gtk/gnome program.
BTW: If something bugs you about GNOME, why don't you complain? I grepped
through my archives of gnome-list and gnome-devel-list and couldn't find a
single post by you. Even developers can't read minds
ure.
You don't specify the exact nature of your problem, e.g. is the screen all
black, doesn't the monitor manage to synchronize the video signal, is the
picture blurred?
Without describing the problem exactly people don't have a chance to solve
it.
Nils
--
Nils Philipps
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have a box with OS/2, NT and Linux 6. I don't imagine RHL 6.1 will get
> > anywhere near it; I'm sure it will stumble on OS/2 as well.
>
> It shouldnt, unless OS/2 and NT use the same partition type.
They d
his got rid of that problem: xterm no longer gives an error message "no
> available ptys", but it still will not run.
>
> Any ideas on what else I might try?
Yeah:
Add this line to /etc/fstab (it is needed for Unix98 style ptys):
none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620
if this were the
case (this should be fixed ASAP -- just in case you would have X problems
in the future).
Nils
--
~~~~~~
Nils Philippsen @college: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vogelsangstrasse 115 @home:
15 matches
Mail list logo