[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> You have been spoiled. In _real_ operating system you would have
> messages like IEC152I-018.
I have indeed.
A warning to others; to an extent, FJ is pulling a few legs;-)
IEC152I-018 is a coded message, and is followed by some message text that is
often enough
John Summerfield a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Why is it so suprising that m$ products give freaky nonsensical error
> > messages?
>
> I've not noticed that Linux messages are universally the very epitome of
> clarity;-(
>
> ___
> Redhat-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Why is it so suprising that m$ products give freaky nonsensical error
> messages?
I've not noticed that Linux messages are universally the very epitome of
clarity;-(
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Please help me on this. Do I need to recompile samba with some misc
> options?
It would be a good start to read the Samba documentation. It describes quite
copiously what is supported and how things might be done.
___
R
On Thu Dec 07 2000 at 19:54, "Alex Sofronie" wrote:
> I have a RH Linux 7.0 with some servers up and running, including Samba
> 2.0.7-21ssl (standard rpm from install). I have w2k pro clients and I want
> to set up RH Linux to be a domain controller. I put that reg in w2k
> registry. With w98 cli
Hi all!
I have a REALLY BIG QUESTION:
I have a RH Linux 7.0 with some servers up and running, including Samba
2.0.7-21ssl (standard rpm from install). I have w2k pro clients and I want
to set up RH Linux to be a domain controller. I put that reg in w2k
registry. With w98 clients all is working pr
