Re: cohabitation Linux/NT

metime) > --- HTH, Adoram -- || | Adoram Rogelemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 | | 1740, Union st.,#1Fax: (518) 374-7760 | | Niskayuna, N.Y. 123

Plextor 14/32X UltraPlex CD-ROM

-- || | Adoram Rogelemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 | | 1740, Union st.,#1Fax: (518) 374-7760 | | Niskayuna, N.Y. 12309Home: (518) 374-9241 | |* Linux - The choice of the GNU generation *| -- PLEASE read the

Re: Sorry but why is rh 5 only seeing 64 megs of ram?

write it every time at the lilo prompt...:-) HTH, Adoram -- |----| | Adoram Rogelemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 | | 1740, Union st.,#1Fax: (518) 374-7760 | | Niskayuna, N.Y. 12309Home: (518) 374-9241 | |* Linux - The choice of

Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH 5.0 exe

On 12 Mar 98 at 20:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 98 18:54:35 -0500, "Scott Drake" wrote: > > >On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 18:07:14 -0500, Adoram Rogel wrote: > > > >>Scott Drake wrote: > >>> > >>> So what you are saying Mi

Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH 5.0 exe

On 12 Mar 98 at 20:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>>> "ar" == Adoram Rogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ar> Dave Wreski wrote: > >> > >> > Well, the truth is that I do feel that I wasted the $50, and I am > >> > d

Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH 5.0 executables !!!)

amiliar enough with it to know if > you've found a bug (which has already been fixed) or you are doing > something wrong. > > Spend the whopping $1.99 and get 4.2 from cheapbytes.com :) They don't have RH 4.2 on their web site, but I'll send them email now. > Dave Th

Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH 5.0 executables !!!)

if at all (I have 4.1). What are the differences between 4.1 and 4.2 ? Thanks, Adoram -- || | Adoram Rogelemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 | | 1740, Union st.,#1Fax: (518) 374-7760 | | Niskayuna, N.

Re: RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH 5.0 executables !!!)

Mike Wangsmo wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 13:11:23 -0500, Adoram Rogel wrote: > > >So, the question is: Can I install RH 5.0 without glibc ? > >I just want libc-5. > >Can I remove glibc now and have just libc-5 ? > > Nope. Every bin on a RH5.0 system (min

RH 5.0 without glibc (libc-6) (was: Can't execute RH 5.0 executables !!!)

#x27;ll install RH 4.1 instead, but I'm trying to avoid it... Thanks in advance, Adoram -- |----| | Adoram Rogelemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 | | 1740, Union st.,#1