Mike Wangsmo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 13:11:23 -0500, Adoram Rogel wrote:
>
> >So, the question is: Can I install RH 5.0 without glibc ?
> >I just want libc-5.
> >Can I remove glibc now and have just libc-5 ?
>
> Nope. Every bin on a RH5.0 system (minus a very small number) is linked
> against glibc. If you want a libc5 system, then you should just use RH 4.2
> and not even think about 5.0
>
> Mike
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mike Wangsmo, QA Manager Red Hat Software,Inc
>
> "If you hit the ball hard enough, you never have to run!" --Mike Piazza
Ok, how about a RH 5.0 that defaults to libc-5 when I compile and has libc-6
for whatever it needs ?
Can I do it without all the procedure that is described in:
http://huizen.dds.nl/~frodol/glibc/index.html
I don't have time for this long procedure, and as my old distribution is
RH4.1
and not 4.2, I'll have to go back to 4.1, if nothing else will work.
Any suggestions to bright up the rest of my day ?
Thanks again, Adoram
--
|----------------------------------------------------|
| Adoram Rogel email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| OpenSource Inc. Tel: (518) 374-5147 |
| 1740, Union st.,#1 Fax: (518) 374-7760 |
| Niskayuna, N.Y. 12309 Home: (518) 374-9241 |
|----* Linux - The choice of the GNU generation *----|
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
