> so now down to the question. whats the difference between a dual
> athlon xp system and a dual athlon mp system besides a >huge< price
> difference? the dual mp motherboards are twice as expensive...as are
> the athlon mp processors.
The mp has been configured by AMD to run in a multiprocessin
This week's edition of Business Week indicates a significant gain in
the use of Linux servers (over Sun and Microsoft) and shows
Redhat as one of the "Winners" in the "Winners and Losers"
column of the article.
Worth a quick read if you are interested in that aspect of the
software game.
You wrote:
> lsattr is not installed on my system.
> chattr not installed on my system either. If it was, I do not know the
It sounds like your system has been cracked badly. The programs
chattr, lsattr, etc are installed by the e2fsprogs rpm during install. It
is highly possible that t
> The problem has to do with the locking of some files... You don't have
> to reboot to fix it. You just have to remove /var/lib/rpm/__db*.
That was one of the first things I tried, but it didn't resolve the issue.
Your diagnosis makes sense, but I didn't see any other locks on the
files. Next
FWIW, I have noticed that on very rare occasions rpm has gone
into "hang" mode (usually when installing a new glibc). The only
way to clear it was to do a "killall -9 rpm" from another screen. This
has only happened on the smp boxen running RH 8.0 or Rawhide,
however.
After some playing --er--
> <...snip >
> I see that Monarch Computing uses the A7M-D, so the MB must work for
> Linux...
>
> I'm wondering if there's something I overlooked that maybe either of
> these machines will work if I did it right. I am about ready to spec
> out a server from Monarch (probably with a Tyan MB) f
Oddly enough, I had a similar problem on an smp development box
running Rawhide (beta) when I tried to upgrade to the new and
improved glibc set. Lots of "I can only do PRIVATE_DB" type
messages, rpm only worked from user accounts (not root) and no
ability to reverse the glibc change.
I ende
> Does anyone have a recommendation for an X-Windows client that I can
> install on the Windows 9X/XP computers to open graphical sessions to
> the Linux server? This would just be used to allow me to perform
> maintenance on the Linux box occasionally.
>
> I would prefer not to spend a bunch of m
The symptom was umount2 couldn't unmount /usr. We added a
diagnostic mod to /etc/rc.d/init.d/halt. Adding a call to /sbin/fuser to
find the offending pid(s) and then to /sbin/lsof to see exactly what files
were preventing the umount we got:
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE
The symptom was umount2 couldn't unmount /usr. We added a diagnostic
mod to /etc/rc.d/init.d/halt. Adding a call to /sbin/fuser to find the offending
pid(s) and then to /sbin/lsof to see exactly what files were preventing the
umount we got:
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE
(Repost - First Message Never Showed Up )
The symptom was umount2 couldn't unmount /usr. We added a diagnostic mod to
/etc/rc.d/init.d/halt. Adding a call to /sbin/fuser to find the offending pid(s) and
then
to /sbin/lsof to see exactly what files were preventing the umount we got:
COMMAND
3rd and last attempt to post this
The symptom was umount2 couldn't unmount /usr. We added a diagnostic mod
to /etc/rc.d/init.d/halt. Adding a call to /sbin/fuser to find the offending pid(s)
and then to /sbin/lsof to see exactly what files were preventing the umount we
got:
COMMAND PID U
Looking for suggestions on how to troubleshoot this thing more
easily:
Dual Athlon MP 2100+ workstation running RH Rawhide { a super
modified 7.3 } . IDE hard drive. The directories /usr and /usr/local
are on separate partitions for size reasons. The start for run level 0
is killall and reboo
Was the directory " /initrd " deleted perchance?
Somehow we deleted this directory on a smp dual athlon 2100
machine recently and ended up with the same problem. Restored it
using the CD to boot rescue and has worked fine ever since.
> I have run into a problem. My Redhat 7.3 will not boo
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Have you tried using up2date to update the system. It should get all
> of the latest packages, and all of the required dependencies. I don't
> have any 7.0 boxes left, so I can't comment regarding the problem.
> However, if it is still a problem after updating with up2da
I discovered that openssl-0.9.6.9 appears not to have undefined
references. That came out two security updates ago, however.
Has anyone else observed the "OpenSSLDie" problem with the
latest openssl security updates (10 and 14) or do I just have some
quirk in my installation??
--
redhat-
I did a periodic 120 day vacuuming and cat hair removal PM and
found that my SSL server no longer starts apache with ssl (works
fine if I comment all the ssl lines out of the conf file). The error
message is :
Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp4.so into server:
/usr/lib/libssl.so.1: undefin
I did a periodic 120 day vacuuming and cat hair removal PM and
found that my SSL server no longer starts apache with ssl (works
fine if I comment all the ssl lines out of the conf file). The error
message is :
Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp4.so into server:
/usr/lib/libssl.so.1: undefi
Has the Redhat kernel-smp-2.4.9-31.athlon.rpm been patched to fix
the apic error message occuring with some new motherboards
(particularly the asus 7m266-d)?
Is there any penalty incurred by booting with -noapic ?
Alternatively it has been suggested to set the MPS to 1.1 from the
1.4 table
Has the Redhat kernel-smp-2.4.9-31.athlon.rpm been patched to fix
the apic error message occuring with some new motherboards
(particularly the asus 7m266-d)?
Is there any penalty incurred by booting with -noapic ?
Alternatively it has been suggested to set the MPS to 1.1 from the
1.4 table
Used:
make all-snavigator
make install-snavigator
{rather than }
make
make install
Issue resolved after examining the top level Makefile. The
documentation on this otherwise excellent program is ... well
rather sparse.
_
I am trying to put source navigator on a machine running RH 7.0
with tcl8.3.4 already installed. I get the infamous message:
` version conflict for package "Tcl": have 8,1, need 8.3'
Tcl 8.1 is built in to source navigator. Removing Tcl8.3.4 is not an
option on that box. Other than changin
I am trying to put source navigator on a machine running RH 7.0
with tcl8.3.4 already installed. I get the infamous message:
` version conflict for package "Tcl": have 8,1, need 8.3'
Tcl 8.1 is built in to source navigator. Removing Tcl8.3.4 is not an
option on that box. Other than changi
SecurityFocus announced the latest wu-ftpd exploit. This was an
Input Validation Error problem. Redhat (and most other
distributions) released a fix for this exploit this week. This is an
anonymous ftp exploit.
Since the exploit code is nothing too formidable for a 13 year old,
and the explo
24 matches
Mail list logo
