Cameron
> | >I get an error that mkinitrd has failed. The "RAM disk support"
> | >and "Init Ram disk" sections of xconfig have been enabled. ANy
> ideas?
> |
> | How about the loopback device?
>
> Specificly, you need loopback support in the kernel you're running
> during
> the build. I've hav
Michael
> > I am rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel on a RedHat9 system. After doing
> >
> > make dep
> > make bzImage
> > make install
> >
> > I get an error that mkinitrd has failed. The "RAM disk support"
> > and "Init Ram disk" sections of xconfig have been enabled. ANy
> ideas?
>
> What type of k
Gordon
> > I get an error that mkinitrd has failed. The "RAM disk support"
> > and "Init Ram disk" sections of xconfig have been enabled. ANy
> ideas?
>
> How about the loopback device?
Should loop-back be built as a module or in kernel?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscrib
Hello list
I am rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel on a RedHat9 system. After doing
make dep
make bzImage
make install
I get an error that mkinitrd has failed. The "RAM disk support"
and "Init Ram disk" sections of xconfig have been enabled. ANy ideas?
Thanks, DAniel
--
redhat-list mailing list
uns
Hello RH list
I have a Dell Precision 350 machine and lspci tells me this about
my SCSI controller:
02:07.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 (rev 07)
02:07.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 (rev 07)
I am trying to recompile my kernel but afte
> | We need more details to help you.
> | Have you activated any insual option in your new
> | kernel ?
>
> And does xterm emit any useful error messages?
The console says
fs types devpts not supported by kernel
After starting X and opening an xterm window I have a normal
looking xterm wit
ect about this message?
I strongly doubt that there are any problems with the RTAI
patch since many others have performed the patch on the
same kernel as I without this problem.
> Gie more information about the problem
> --- Daniel Sheltraw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >
> Hel
Hello RH list
I did a rebuild of my 2.4.20 kernel on RH9 today and I am now
having trouble getting a command line to appear when I open
a xterm window after X starts. The problem is in my new kernel
since the old works fine in this regard.
Any ideas?
Thanks again,
DAniel
--
redhat-list maili
Michael
> > I am having a problem building a new kernel for a MSI 845E Max
> > Motherboard. I am running RH9.0 and rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel.
> >
> > The problem appears to be with the HDD/CD-ROM controller (an
> > ICH4 on an Intel 845E chipset) of the IDE hard-drive (WD 40GB
> > IDE/7200). W
Hello Redhat list
I am having a problem building a new kernel for a MSI 845E Max
Motherboard. I am running RH9.0 and rebuilding a 2.4.20 kernel.
The problem appears to be with the HDD/CD-ROM controller (an
ICH4 on an Intel 845E chipset) of the IDE hard-drive (WD 40GB
IDE/7200). When I boot my
OK thanks again. Darn Decaf.
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Coffee must not have kicked in when, on Thu, 3 Apr 2003, I wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I don't know where to find P4 binaries of 2.95.x. I also
> don't
> > know if 2.95.x will compile for the P4.
>
> Of course, i386 and i686
t; shared
> libs. The libs you'll need are in /usr/local/gcc-2.95.3/lib this is
> not
> part of the standard shared lib path. There are a few ways to fix
> this, it
> all depends on how you want to configure your system.
>
> If you run into problems send me an email a
Matthew
OK thnks for all of your help.
Daniel
Quoting Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Daniel Sheltraw wrote:
>
> > Matthew
> >
> > Would you happen to know where I could download binaries for a
> > Pentium 4 machine? I did not
Matthew
> > > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler
> and
> > > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > > real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI patch says in a
> README
> > > f
Cliff
> > The reason for my initial question about the GCC 3.2 compiler and
> > a compiler fit for kernel work is that a remembered the problem
> > with GCC 2.96. I am patching a 2.4.20 kernel with the RTAI
> > real-time executive patch. The latest RTAI patch says in a README
> > file that the
Hello Again
> > > > So was this the kcc or kgcc compiler, or was that something
> else
> > > > altogether ?
> > >
> > > Yes, kgcc.
> >
> > I doubt it. I don't even have kgcc installed, and no problem
> building
> > anything. I think kgcc was just a 7.x creature, back when early
> 2.96
> > compile
Hello Redhat list
I see that the RedHat 8.0 distribution has the GCC 3.2 compiler.
Does RedHat 8.0 have a compiler fit for kernel work in particular
2.95.x?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
17 matches
Mail list logo