I disagree, I think there are several valid reasons to be annoyed by Red
Hat's latest move. Most of which have to do with running Red Hat in an
enterprise environment.
Why should third parties develop for an ever changing platform? Already
it's hard enough to convince them that there is a large en
. And if I check the status with lsraid -A -a /dev/md0 -d
/dev/hdx1 the status of the last drive is there but it shows up as
"unbound" rather than good. Has anyone ever seen these results before?
Thank you,
Jared Brick
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello list,
I have a problem with a Hewlett Packard LaserJet 4L, it seems for some
reason to stall during print jobs and I have to remove the print job
before the printer will print again. This happens almost everytime. I
have a LaserJet 4 and it never seems to fail, but the 4L can never s
whereis shutdown
whereis reboot
whereis halt
There is your answer
Jared
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 03:14, David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found that I can reboot my RedHat 7.1 system as an ordinary user by
> executing 'reboot' on the commandline. However, I can't shutdown/reboot my
> system using 'shutdo
>From the sounds of it, this will do the trick (without using KDE):
ps -AH
Jared
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 16:41, Lyn wrote:
> If you use KDE, the KDE System guard is probably the best for this purpose.
> When you open it up, go to the list of Processes. Go to the check box that
> says Tree down a
This might sound stupid, but are you using Iptables/Ipchains at all? Did
you make sure to leave the Windows networking ports open? I know you
might not be firewalling at all, but often in troubleshooting people
miss these sort of things.
Jared
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 13:12, Jay Paulson wrote:
> I'
Hi,
You can just convert it to postscript and then to pdf. man ps2pdf.
Jared
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 14:35, FatDaemon wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm totally sure about it.
>
> You only have to open the print dialog and choose print to pdf (you could see
> the acrobat logo besides it).
> This is the dialo
> Despite the fact that people say that ext3 is good enough for production
> use, you can't ignore the dozens and dozens of complaints people make
> about it constantly. In all honesty, ext3 is still under development as
> are most journalling filesystems. I wouldn't use it, say, for the root
Great, thanks!
Jared
On Sunday 30 December 2001 21:02, you wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2001 08:59 pm, Jared Brick wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way around portmapper on 7.2? It seems that Nautilus/KDE
> > both use the File Alteration Monitor which is dependent
Hi,
Is there a way around portmapper on 7.2? It seems that Nautilus/KDE both use
the File Alteration Monitor which is dependent on portmap...is there a way
around this so that I would not have to run portmap?
Thanks in advance,
Jared
___
Redhat-li
Thanks! Worked perfectly.
Jared
On Sunday 30 December 2001 20:21, you wrote:
> > From: Jared Brick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I finally had time to update my system to 7.2. In 7.1 I somehow (for the
> > life of me I can't remembe
Hi,
I finally had time to update my system to 7.2. In 7.1 I somehow (for the life
of me I can't remember) set up X to use the 3x server rather than 4x server,
since my video card is not well supported on 4x. I am now having the same
issue but am having no luck remembering how I did it. Does an
man rndc.conf
Jared
On Friday 28 December 2001 23:20, you wrote:
> hey people
> i've just upgraded my box to rh7.2 and i'm trying to configure bind9 to run
> now i've managed to configure bind8 before
> but for some reason the powers that be decided that bind9 had to be
> different
>
> so when i
13 matches
Mail list logo
