RE: RH4.2/2.0.33 web server performance...

1998-03-13 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 10:26 AM 3/13/98 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are running Apache, and 2.0.33 kernel. I will even consider opinions on other platforms. It's not really a RedHat (or Linux for that matter) problem per se. It's unlikely you'll get better performance out of an other HTTP server than

Re: Linux - a moving target

1998-03-13 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 12:37 PM 3/13/98 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "We DID, but over time we found developing for linux was like shooting at a moving target. People have so many different configurations, and the differences go much deeper than just surface changes. SNIP itself in its own foot? My reply is

RE: RH4.2/2.0.33 web server performance...

1998-03-13 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 09:35 AM 3/13/98 -0600, Derek Balling wrote: On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Jonathan Peterson wrote: It depends what you are doing. For flat files, Zeus is widely acknowledged as the fastest web server around: http://www.zeus.co.uk/ Does anyone actually HAVE servers that are doing just flat-files

Linux Standards (was: Linux a moving target?)(long)

1998-03-13 Thread Jonathan Peterson
My recent reply about the problem of Linux being so heterogenous set me thinking. There's not much point having standards, if they move as fast as Linux does! So, these standards would have to have quite solid roadmaps setting out the intended developments for the future, so that vendors could

It's true - Re: kernelcfg won't write conf.modules

1998-03-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 10:11 PM 3/10/98 +, Rodney O. Kerstetter wrote: Gibson, Todd wrote: Hello, While searching for a solution to my problem, I came across this message in the archives and no reply. This is exactly my problem. When presssing the button to save a new interface (or to modify an existing

Re: rpm or tar.gz

1998-03-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 09:54 AM 3/11/98 -0700, you wrote: since it was brougt up, could anyone tell me the pros and cons about redhat vs. devian vs. slackware vs caldera etc. Arg. Here come 500+ emails :) I have used Slackware in the past because I'm an OldTimer (tm), and recently grabbed RedHat to see what all

Re: usercfg no good for a lot of users???

1998-03-09 Thread Jonathan Peterson
At 05:16 AM 3/9/98 -0500, Douglas F. Elznic wrote: Hello, I recently upgraded a server at work to linux. The box houses 650+ users and usercfg hates it. When I run usercfg it gives the following errors: [root@ian log]# usercfg Red Hat Linux usercfg 3.5 Copyright (C) 1996, 1997 Red Hat Software

Kerneld control panel is broken?

1998-03-05 Thread Jonathan Peterson
Hi, When I use the kerneld config part of the control-panel thing, it simply doesn't work. I select my module just fine, add any parameters, and restart the kernel daemon, but nothing actually changes. Nothing ever gets written to /etc/conf.modules, and no changes are made. Failing this, where