Hi Chris!
Looks like you're looking for RAID Level 1 solution. There was an article in
Sysadmin (I think) not a long time ago, yes, I just found that. Look for June's
issue of SysAdmin. I've just checked their web site, but they don't publish
theirs articles, so you might want to contact the auth
Looks like RH5.1 is going to be released on July 1. No more
speculations, now its a fact.
And this time 3 CDs for the price of 2!!! What a deal :)
Mike
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /m
Cam Vetter wrote:
> Where were they giving away CDs? I was at Comdex and at their booth, and I
> talked with them for awhile and they didn't offer me a CD, in fact they
> wouldn't even sell me one. They just gave me a brochure and told me to
> order it, so I walked around to the other of the
Tim Larkins (EUKSHEL1PO) wrote:
> The other question is.. how do I make my system fail safe so that if
> I do make a dodgy kernel I can simply boot with the old kernel try and sort
> out the problems?
>
You can copy your new kernel to the floppy and boot the system from there. In
case
I have name server on 486DX 100Mhz with 20M RAM. Upgraded to RH5.0 in December.
Never had problems so far. Surely doesn't look like RH5.0 problem to me
Mike
Serge Pluess wrote:
> Hi there
>
> just wanted to give some comments to my experiences with RedHat 5.0 as a
> sever.
>
> I had 4.2 running
I'm not sure if that is what you need, but there is a diagnostic program for
3Com 3c5x9 ether cards. Look for 3c5x9utils-1.0-1.
RPM can be found on the Red Hat server
Mike
plaven wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to know if there is a generic NIC diag program out there for
> Linux? The reason
When you use verbose mode and get:
250 Message accepted for delivery
it means your mail reached other server and the problem probably is with their
setting.
Would they filter pine (just a guess)?
Mike
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.
Nope. Just happend to have renewal form in my hand:
Domestic 1yr. $39.002yrs. $73.00
Canada/Mexico 1yr. $58.002yrs. $108.00
Forein 1yr. $69.002yrs. $129.00
Mike
Dave Wreski wrote:
> > > SysAdmin has had several articles about Linux in it so fa
I don't know about Unix Review, but January's SysAdmin leading title was
LINUXhttp://www.samag.com/archive/0701/
Looks like some people know about Linux already
Mike
Dave Wreski wrote:
> > Now, let's make the assumption Red Hat produces a 50% *net* on each copy
> > they sell at $50 for the
Why don't you run Sendmail in verbose mode (-v). This way you can see how Sendmail
behave. If Sendmail works fine then it's problem with Pine
Mike
Linus åkerlund wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm having a strange problem, and I don't really know where to start looking
> for a solution to it. I use Pine a
I had the same problem on one of my machines. Mouseconfig was properly
detecting the mouse, but then it couldn't write the proper link for it. Finally
I had to do it manually. There is update for it on the Red Hat site.
You can either download it or do it by yourself.
Mike
Guy Shilo wrote:
> hel
If they use static IP's you could use MX in DNS
Mike
bchaffin wrote:
> Does anyone have information on how to configure sendmail to store email and
> then allow the client to trigger delivery of there domain? I have clients
> who want to use Microsoft Exchange with a dial-up connection to picku
Kenny Melton wrote:
> For some reason, everytime I try to send email to any user on my system
> from an outside system, it always rejects it. Only one user can recieve
> email without an error and there is nothing special about his account.
> The system has a direct T1 connection to the interne
Bryan Andregg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> KONDO Kazumoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hello, there, again...
> >I am new to Red Hat, and I like this very much!!
> >I have a question on mail setting, especially sendmail.cf.
> >I would like to setup my server which can handle
Hmm, I am not really sure I know what you are planning to do. I you are going to do all
that just to have linux installed on it I don't think it is a good idea. I'd rather
have
few partitions with different directories on it
Mike
zhenhua wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Miroslaw
CS wrote:
> What is the difference between mounting drivers and partitions with this "Multiple
> devices driver support" or use NFS?
> Thanks
> CS
>
I didn't have a chance to use this option yet, but my understanding is that this is
very
useful for very large single files (i.e. database files
There is an option in kernel called Multiple devices driver support
(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD) that let you make one logical drive using few different physical
disks.
Mike
Win Htin wrote:
> Interesting. How did you accomplish that? As far as I know, in SunOS or Solaris,
> you need RAID or ODS/SDS to do
It comes with "Utility" packages. Check:
/usr/X11R6/bin/xbru &
Type it and see what comes out of it
Mike
Jim Chisholm wrote:
> Hi Folks..
> Anyone else run into this? I recently purchased the full Professional
> Version Applixware 4.3.7.
> which comes with an "Official" RedHat 5.0 CD.
> Apart f
nslookup' again. This time you'll see:Default Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Miroslaw Wodniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date
Rick wrote:
> Hello everyone! I am having some problems connecting my linux box to a
> cable modem. Maybe one of you can lend a hand. = ]
>
> I have my own domain. I have been hosting it on my box, with a 56k
> dialup account. I now have a cable box from my local cable company, and
> a static
Try add to Cw and DM lines in you sendmail.cf:foobarbaz.com
Also, you must remember about proper MX in DNS
Mike
KONDO Kazumoto wrote:
> Hello, there!
>
> I am new to Red Hat 5.0, and I like this very much!!
> I have a question on mail setting, especially sendmail.cf.
> I would like to setup
Donavan Nelson wrote:
> Agree, but I should be able to do 800 x 600 with 256 colors and on meg of
> video memory. My winblows machine does this without any problem. Is X
> that much different?
>
In one machine I have Stealth Pro with 1M and it gave me even better resolution
(1024x768) with 2
Casey Bralla wrote:
> I'm follwwing through the How-To on setting up a DNS and just hit a
> brick wall. I can set up a caching-only server, but can not get the
> DNS to recognize "linux.bogus" as outlined int e How-to.
>
> Anybody work through this How-to? Did it work for you?
>
> J R Casey B
1M RAM memory on video card is not going to give many more colors. You could
try to reduce the size of your screen and/or number of virtual screens (not
sure if that helps). I don't think forcing 'bpp' with 'startx' command would
help
Mike
Donavan Nelson wrote:
> I've got a stock install of RH 5
line, next to you machine name, otherwise you will see only
'Name: localhost' line, without 'Address: 127.0.0.1'
hope this time it'll work
Mike
robert collins wrote:
> Miroslaw Wodniak wrote:
>
> > I'd check loopback address. There may be something wrong in
I'd check loopback address. There may be something wrong in your db.127.0.0
file (or whatever you call it). Your server should work without it, but it
looks like for more complicated servers you may need it.
Mike
robert collins wrote:
> John J. Donohue wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, robert coll
Jay Vassos-Libove wrote:
> This isn't a Linux specific problem, but Linux did help me to pinpoint
> it...
>
> You all may recall a month or so ago I called for help because I seemed to
> have suffered an IRQ line failure on a Pentium 133 system.
>
> In the end, I simply picked a different IRQ a
27 matches
Mail list logo
