I agree with you 100%. In fact thats why I bought an IBM Thinkpad to support
the Linux community by throwing money at IBM to show that there are good
reasons "$" for them to continue to support Linux and hopefully in turn they
would give Linux a 'corporate face'.
I just wanted to inform people ou
Hi all,
I'm contemplating purchasing a new colour network printer for our office.
Does anyone reading the list have a suggestion as to make/model can be Laser
or InkJet. Would be used in printing from Linux, Windows 98, NT, 2000 and
Mac boxes. Thanks for your input.
CM
___
thanx guys i should have re-posted after thinking for a while it came to
me...its been a long week...
CM
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Putnam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: ADSL & DHCP
Hi everybody,
I've got a rather obscure question tonight, however, I'm hoping someone can
help.
Here at home I get online (DSL) via the Roaring Penguin software (rp-pppoe)
from the 7.0 cdrom. However, at work we have a cable RH 6.2 server which
assigns IP addresses via DHCP.
So, here's my prob
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Which is correct? /proc/cpuinfo
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, cmead wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just got a new IBM laptop. In the BIOS it reads 700 Mhz it is a Intel
> > PIII. As it was advertised
Subject: Re: Which is correct? /proc/cpuinfo
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, cmead wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just got a new IBM laptop. In the BIOS it reads 700 Mhz it is a Intel
> > PIII. As it was advertised. However, in /proc/cpuinfo it reads 546Mhz.
What
> > gives?
Hi,
I just got a new IBM laptop. In the BIOS it reads 700 Mhz it is a Intel
PIII. As it was advertised. However, in /proc/cpuinfo it reads 546Mhz. What
gives? I have never come across this dicrepency before on any of my systems!
Although this is my first laptop experience with Linux.
I find it h
Great guys thanks for all the suggestions. I'm goin to test on a similar box
soon in the next cpl days
CM
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Nielson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Redhat list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Drive Imaging
> Linux Journal
the 'cp' command is
would preserve all permissions however the 40GB would be seen as two 5GB
partions ? and /home respectively?
CM
> >
> > *** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
> >
> > On 8/01/01 at 19:02 cmead wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
Imaging
> cp doesn't keep permissions, I learned this the hard way, here's the most
> reliable way to do it:
>
> mkdir dst_dir
> cd dst_dir
> (cd src_dir; tar cf - . ) | tar xvpf -
>
> david
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "cmead" <[E
ARATOR ***
>
> On 8/01/01 at 19:02 cmead wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm using 6.2, I have a 10GB hard drive which is partitioned in half
first
> >5
> >GB is / the other half is /home. The box is our server which i use for
> DNS,
> >Samba, Net
Hi,
I'm using 6.2, I have a 10GB hard drive which is partitioned in half first 5
GB is / the other half is /home. The box is our server which i use for DNS,
Samba, Netatalk, Masq, printing...so for me alot of work went into setting
this up it runs perfectly :)
My question, is I want to upgrade t
12 matches
Mail list logo
