Re: LS-120 newbie question

Hello Eduardo, have a look at my fstab... This works for me pretty good..:-)) Thomas Eduardo Arista wrote: 23A66BF3.8645.A30E70@localhost">Rick:Thanks for your advice.I tried it but it did not work.At boot time the bios recognize the drive as:ATAPI Device LS-120 ver 5 00 UHD FloppyA

Returned mail: see transcript for details

Hello, I am trying to manage three downloads at the same time by running my netscape 4.75 three times on different workspaces. After I started the process I dad to leave for some hours. When I had look at about 2 hours all three processes had bee ceased. There was an error message: Maybe

Re: hdaparm failes

Hello Leonard, thanks again for your helpful advice, dma and I/O 32 bit are working quite well without any problems. ciao Thomas Leonard den Ottolander schrieb: > I personally put it early in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, but you > could put it in > rc.local, where one usu

Re: hdaparm failes

Hello Leonhard and others, works fine:-))) I ask myself how to integrate this feature durable Which file is to be chanded by adding the hdparm command ?? ciao Thomas Leonard den Ottolander schrieb: > > > You can't set DMA for a partition. So "hdparm -d 1 /dev/hd

hdaparm failes

Hello to everybody, whilst fine tuning my RH 7.0 for a better performance hdparm is kind of resistant to this:-(( Every time I am trying to enable the the dma access I got the same annoying error message. It turns to be out that this isn't possible, at least for the moment ! (see attac

Re: StarOffice 5.2

Hello Jack, thanks for your response I'll give it a try... Thomas Jack Bowling schrieb: > ** Reply to message from hello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on > Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:37:43 +0100 > > > > Run, don't walk, to http://www.helixcode.com nd download the > helix

Re: StarOffice 5.2

Jack Bowling schrieb: > Thomas wrote: > > > Hallo Jack, > > > Ciao > > Thomas > > Aaagh!!! Sorry, Thomas. Here in Canada, we do not have metered internet > access so a big download is not of much importance...just leave it > downloading overnight and pick things up in the morning ;) Wow, what k

Re: Memory Leak

Hello Vu, Vu Vuong schrieb: > Hi, Could someone help me diagnose my system. > I use 'top' to monitor the system activities. > As I watch, the memory used increases. I don't > know what is causing it. Earlier this week it > was at 130MB free, now it's at

Re: StarOffice 5.2

to my problems, because I didn't find a plain reference too.Perhaps you can give me a more direct hint ..:-))) Ciao Thomas Jack Bowling schrieb: > ** Reply to message from hello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on > Wed, 06 Dec 2000 14:37:43 +0100 > > > Hello all,

Re: I've got a problem connecting to the internet with a Externalmodem.Please help.

Hi, Roadrunner schrieb: > Hi, > > The last time i've posted to this list was when I had problems with an > internal modem. That modem is still busy and i'm looking for a driver/rpm so > the box sees the modem, but that's not the problem and the reasonthat I'm > writing to the list. > > The proble

StarOffice 5.2

Hello all, I am running StarOffice 5.2 on RH 7.0 in Gnome 1.2 / window manager sawfish 0.30.3-10. My maschine is a Pentium II MMX at 300 MHz equiped with 64 MB RAM. Suddently without an identifiable "omen" StarOffice 5.2 crashes again and again. The error message says: Unrecoverable e

Re: up2date

to finetune the agent ! Because I guessed to have a configuration problem. Maybe I shhould go to the errata section without using the agent. Thanks Thomas > > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, hello wrote: > > ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EM

Re: up2date

don't get any error messages, but downloading by the up2date- agent is a (financial and emotional) sacrifice. If I understand your message well there is no bug or something else in this program, maybe it works like this, no way to finetune or doing something to improve the performance of my

up2date

Hello to everybody, runing RH 7.0 for about two weeks I am generally quite well, so I registered at RH- Network. Since than I tried the up2date- agent for serveral times, and finally quited using this thing. The reason is that the download of upgrades is quite slow, i.e. it took almost half an

Re: Performance

brian davison schrieb: > More details will be needed for a diagnosis. > What type of install was done? (workstation, server, custom? ) I choosed the "workstation" option. > > what are the partition sizes, and arrangement.? One big partition, or > several. Filesystem 1k-blocks U