Many thanks for the advice on large file support. RH7.2 is on its way!
Go for RH7.2 and save yourself a lot of hassle...
--
-terry
digital OutPost
http://www.dop.com
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to deal with large files, RH7.2 on a dual pentium box
running Samba should be able to deal with and serve files larger than
2 gigs? That it's basically a 2.4 kernel thing?
Thanks,
-terry
At 12:22 AM -0800 2/3/02, Kevin McConnell wrote:
--- terry barnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a question
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, so I apologize if it isn't.
Running intel RH6.1 with 18 gigs of drive space striped as RAID 0. Is there
a way to work with files larger than 2 gigs? I understand there is an issue
with 32 bit architecture, but I believe there are other OSes doing
I know that while evaluating Reiser FS for use on SourceForge we've
created files up to 4gb in size.
Some versions of reiserfs had a hack for this. Its not a good idea and Im
told its now been removed. If you grab the LFS patches for 2.2 from the
RH 6.2beta kernel rpms you'll be able to build
I've been unsuccessfully trying to move a 3 gig file from WinNTSP4 onto our
RH6.1 server that has a 9 gig ext2 drive mounted as /bigdrive.
Samba fails at 2 gigs with an error in the log saying, "File too large." I
thought, well maybe Samba has a problem with large files. So I tried to ftp
the
Hi Chris,
e2fs has a 2gb filesize limit.
Thanks for the quick reply. Is there a fs than I can use that will handle
2g files?
-terry
Digital OutPost
http://www.dop.com
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
At 12:02 PM -0800 12/30/99, Hal Burgiss wrote:
There is a 2G ext2 file size limit that is the result of the x86 32bit
architecture. IIRC, there is a patch somewhere that ups the limit.
Is it possible that using a RAID could increase the max filesize? Up until
last week, we used to have two 9
