Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-21 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:43:24AM +, Gary Stainburn wrote: : > 10.0.0.0- 10.255.255.255 : > 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 : > 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 : > : > We will refer to the first block as "24-bit block", the second as

Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-21 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Thursday 21 February 2002 12:23 am, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > Any documentation that states this is a class B network is wrong. It is a > > class C. > > > > Here is the breakdown... > > Class Netmask Network Addresses > > A 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0- 127.255.255.255 > > B 255.255.

Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-20 Thread Edward Dekkers
> Any documentation that states this is a class B network is wrong. It is a > class C. > > Here is the breakdown... > Class Netmask Network Addresses > A 255.0.0.0 0.0.0.0- 127.255.255.255 > B 255.255.0.0 128.0.0.0 - 191.255.255.255 > C 255.255.255.0 192.0.0.0 - 223.2

Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-20 Thread Ziad Samaha
It seems I got the problem wrong, Sorry >From: Gary Stainburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes >Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:14:23 +0

Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-20 Thread Brian Ashe
Hello Edward, Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 4:41:54 AM, you textually orated: ED> Just something that's always evaded my comprehension. ED> I always use the 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 range for internal networks. ED> Usually the first 9 reserved for servers (.1-.10) and the rest clients. Fro

Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-20 Thread Gary Stainburn
**Disclaimer - all self-tought** Simple answer, you should have been fine having a server on 192.168.0.1/16 and a client on 192.168.1.1/16. (/16 is another way of writing 255.255.0.0) When sending an IP packet, the sender compares it's IP and netmask with the IP and netmask of the receiver, an

Re: [OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-20 Thread Ziad Samaha
kers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [OT] Subnets and Classes >Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:41:54 +0800 > >Just something that's always evaded my comprehension. > >I always use the 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255

[OT] Subnets and Classes

2002-02-20 Thread Edward Dekkers
Just something that's always evaded my comprehension. I always use the 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 range for internal networks. Usually the first 9 reserved for servers (.1-.10) and the rest clients. From all the documentation I've read this is a Class B network (16 bit), and to use it I should