RE: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-27 Thread Ward William E DLDN
> -Original Message- > From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 4:09 PM > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:54:28PM -0500, Stone, Timothy wrote: > > It goes without saying that there are well-defined traditions in > > posting to newsgroups and mailing lists. Re

Re: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:09:07PM -0500, Stone, Timothy wrote: > > But no conventions for foreign language characters? Logically, your mail headers are in plain text (you're only allowed 7-bit ASCII symbols in the headers). One of the headers defines what charset the body of the mail is in. >Fro

Re: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Rick Johnson
Ed Wilts wrote: But what about some of these that seem to go undocumented: /Italics/ _Underline_ *Bold|Emphasis* You physically can't use true italics, underline, or bold in a plain text e-mail. If you want to use funny symbols around them like you did, use them sparingly and you won't annoy

Re: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread David Busby
> > -- > > Tue Mar 25 10:35:01 EST 2003 > > 10:35:01 up 3 days, 21:22, 4 users, load average: 0.42, 0.53, 0.51 > > -- > > |____ | x x| > > | / ,, /| |'-. | htt

RE: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Stone, Timothy
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:54:28PM -0500, Stone, Timothy wrote: > > It goes without saying that there are well-defined traditions in > > posting to newsgroups and mailing lists. Reading the many > FAQs on the > > web one will find the common rules: > > You forgot the first one in your post: WR

RE: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Stone, Timothy
> Around Wed,Mar 26 2003, at 03:54, Stone, Timothy, wrote: > > It goes without saying that there are well-defined > traditions in posting to newsgroups and mailing lists. > Reading the many FAQs on the web one will find the common rules: > > > snipping irrelevant text from replies Good one. :

Re: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 03:54:28PM -0500, Stone, Timothy wrote: > It goes without saying that there are well-defined traditions in > posting to newsgroups and mailing lists. Reading the many FAQs on the > web one will find the common rules: You forgot the first one in your post: WRAP at 72 charac

Re: [OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Roger
Around Wed,Mar 26 2003, at 03:54, Stone, Timothy, wrote: > It goes without saying that there are well-defined traditions in posting to > newsgroups and mailing lists. Reading the many FAQs on the web one will find the > common rules: > snipping irrelevant text from replies > > Ok, the normal

[OT] on formatting conventions

2003-03-26 Thread Stone, Timothy
It goes without saying that there are well-defined traditions in posting to newsgroups and mailing lists. Reading the many FAQs on the web one will find the common rules: - Do not top-post - DO NOT SHOUT But what about some of these that seem to go undocumented: /Italics/ _Underline_ *Bold|E