> The few problems I had was a Kernal problem and a
> problem with apache. Apache 2.0 wouldn't take my old
> httpd.conf
>
> Took me a bit to figure it out. I also had to edit the
> php.ini file to turn of Safe mode. Other than that, I've had no
> problems. Been running a week strong now.
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 15:50, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> dogface wrote:
>
> > me personally, i'd like to wait for a .1 or .2.
> > but i have nothing to loose. so im going to go for it.
>
> See, therein lies the problem. All my servers are live machines that I
> can't afford to have a tremend
I've recently upgraded to 8.0
The few problems I had was a Kernal problem and a
problem with apache. Apache 2.0 wouldn't take my old
httpd.conf
Took me a bit to figure it out. I also had to edit the
php.ini file to turn of Safe mode. Other than that, I've had no
problems. Been running a w
dogface wrote:
> me personally, i'd like to wait for a .1 or .2.
> but i have nothing to loose. so im going to go for it.
See, therein lies the problem. All my servers are live machines that I
can't afford to have a tremendous downtime on. Since 8.0 is still fresh out of
the oven, I'm not s
went with purple
until I saw the sunset you made on Tuesday.
That was Cool! Eugene -- 3rd Grader
- Original Message -
From: Ashley M. Kirchner
To: Red Hat Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:07 PM
Subject: [RHL] 7.3 vs 8.0
As I'm rebuilding several of my servers, I&#
As I'm rebuilding several of my servers, I'm wondering if I should consider
RH8.0, or whether I should stick to 7.3. Past experience has taught me to wait
for a .1 or .2 release, and I'm wondering if that's still the case with 8.0.
Anyone care to comment?
--
W | I haven't lost my mind; it's
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 12:07, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> As I'm rebuilding several of my servers, I'm wondering if I should consider
> RH8.0, or whether I should stick to 7.3. Past experience has taught me to wait
> for a .1 or .2 release, and I'm wondering if that's still the case with 8.0
