=>charset="iso-8859-1"
=>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=>
=>Dear sir
=>Thank u so much for very good explanation of BSD & SysV . I am really very
=>much happy with write up. It is really a great write up.
=>
=>Thank u very very much.
=>Selim
=>
=>
=>---
Dear sir
Thank u so much for very good explanation of BSD & SysV . I am really very
much happy with write up. It is really a great write up.
Thank u very very much.
Selim
- Original Message -
From: "Michael R. Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
though I'd be hard pressed to come up with examples off the top of my head).
Linux tries to be a sensible hybrid of both systems, to the delight of some
and the frustration of others, but the real lesson I get from it is that the
BSD/SysV distinction is really only useful in a historical cont
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Selim Jahangir wrote:
> Dear all
> what is the fundamental diff between BSD and SysV unix ?
>
> Explanation is expected .
>
> Another question:
> What is this file " initrd.img" during boot time ?
>
itird=Initial Ram Disk. It's a "mini" linux which is loaded
into ram at boo
for initrd.img
Under the /boot directory, the kernel file must be bzImage or
vmlinuz-version. And one of most important file is initrd.img.
The initrd.img contains all the modules (driver). The kernel
loads initrd.img to RAM as RAM drive. Hence, when booting up
a linux, all the device, that are m
Dear all
what is the fundamental diff between BSD and SysV unix ?
Explanation is expected .
Another question:
What is this file " initrd.img" during boot time ?
Thanks
selim
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com
