Dear sir
Thank u so much for very good explanation of BSD SysV . I am really very
much happy with write up. It is really a great write up.
Thank u very very much.
Selim
- Original Message -
From: "Michael R. Jinks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
t;iso-8859-1"
=Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
=Dear sir
=Thank u so much for very good explanation of BSD SysV . I am really very
=much happy with write up. It is really a great write up.
=
=Thank u very very much.
=Selim
=
=
=- Original Message -
=From: "Michael R. Jinks&qu
of my head).
Linux tries to be a sensible hybrid of both systems, to the delight of some
and the frustration of others, but the real lesson I get from it is that the
BSD/SysV distinction is really only useful in a historical context; as Linux
demonstrates, you can mix and match where appropriate.
Dear all
what is the fundamental diff between BSD and SysV unix ?
Explanation is expected .
Another question:
What is this file " initrd.img" during boot time ?
Thanks
selim
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for initrd.img
Under the /boot directory, the kernel file must be bzImage or
vmlinuz-version. And one of most important file is initrd.img.
The initrd.img contains all the modules (driver). The kernel
loads initrd.img to RAM as RAM drive. Hence, when booting up
a linux, all the device, that are
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Selim Jahangir wrote:
Dear all
what is the fundamental diff between BSD and SysV unix ?
Explanation is expected .
Another question:
What is this file " initrd.img" during boot time ?
itird=Initial Ram Disk. It's a "mini" linux which is loaded
into ram at boot in
