I have 48x media right here. It was bought in winter I think.
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 17:57, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Hi Bill
> >
> > On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:26, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> > > I hadn't see
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Bill
>
> On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:26, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> > I hadn't seen any replies to this yet, so I'll venture an
> observation
> > of my own: CDRW should be the master device on any IDE chain that
Hi Bill
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:26, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
> I hadn't seen any replies to this yet, so I'll venture an observation
> of my own: CDRW should be the master device on any IDE chain that
> they are attached to, at least whenever possible. I've noticed
> marked reliability concer
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:26:54AM -0500, Ward William E DLDN wrote:
>
> I hadn't seen any replies to this yet, so I'll venture an observation
> of my own: CDRW should be the master device on any IDE chain that
> they are attached to, at least whenever possible. I've noticed
> marked reliability
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Wardle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Hi
>
> A few weeks back, I purchased a new Lite-On 52x52x24 EIDE/ATAPI CD-RW
> drive, which supports a buffer underrun technology Lite-On calls
> BURNproof (or something similar).
>
> When I first tried to write a CD
Hi
A few weeks back, I purchased a new Lite-On 52x52x24 EIDE/ATAPI CD-RW
drive, which supports a buffer underrun technology Lite-On calls
BURNproof (or something similar).
When I first tried to write a CD image using cdrecord, I was highly
disappointed that I was only able to successfully write C
