I give up we have different views on how DNS should work.
Thanks for your insight.
david
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
structure.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
I give up we have different views on how DNS should work.
Thanks for your insight.
And thank you for the lively discussion.
- -d
- --
David Talkington
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp
- --
Well, that just shows once again that all the good names have already been
picked...IBM.com, Microsoft.com, Dekkers.com...
Gerry
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
After a bit of investigation, it seems someone had indeed registered
dekkers.com way back in 1997.
The record was
You should not be using the root servers. Instead use the DNS servers of
your ISP.
david
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 09:16 06 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| domain.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
You should not be using the root servers. Instead use the DNS servers of
your ISP.
That isn't necessarily true, and is a long and sordid debate that I
don't think you really want to open. ;-) The choice of DNS resolvers
boils
Hi David
Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
structure. What I do if I don't like the ISP's DNS servers is use a
different one, but not the root. The easiest way to look at it is, if
everybody did it, what would the effect be?
david
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so you _do_ want to open this discussion. I'll do my best, with
the caveat that this is pre-espresso.
Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
structure.
I'll respectfully suggest that I'm not able to find any
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, David Talkington wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, so you _do_ want to open this discussion. I'll do my best, with
the caveat that this is pre-espresso.
I don't want to get into a long debate. I was just pointing out the
design concept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dave brett wrote:
Using the root servers defeats the purpose of the design of the whole
structure.
I'll respectfully suggest that I'm not able to find any evidence in
the RFC to support that conclusion. Read on ...
I would not expect this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Talkington wrote:
Remember that the roots _only_ answer queries for top-level
namespaces. They are not recursive. That means (following my previous
example) that even if every one of my workstations hits a redhat.com
site every two minutes
Well, that just shows once again that all the good names have already been
picked...IBM.com, Microsoft.com, Dekkers.com...
Gerry
LOL - and that's all I'll say about that. Looks like I've already started a
DNS debate.
Regards and thanks again.
Edward.
What the???
I have set up an internal domain 'domain.com'
On this domain I have 5 PCs
1 Linux 6.2 (server.domain.com)(192.168.0.10)
2 My own PC (edward.domain.com)(192.168.0.2)
3 My wife's PC (kylie.domain.com)(DHCP - only just starting to test
it - can drop it back to
Of Edward Dekkers
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DNS weirdness
What the???
I have set up an internal domain 'domain.com'
On this domain I have 5 PCs
1 Linux 6.2 (server.domain.com)(192.168.0.10)
2 My own PC (edward.domain.com)(192.168.0.2)
3 My
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
kylie or kylie.domain.com (216.147.69.55 --- Where did THIS come from). It
says it is pinging from 203.59.196.224. OK, I thought maybe stuffed up my
DHCP somehow, but it gets worse. PING responds EVEN with the PC turned OFF.
How does that work???
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote:
What the???
I have set up an internal domain 'domain.com'
domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
Gerry
--
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer
___
Redhat-list mailing
domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
sorry, domain.com was just the example I used Gerry.
your first answer is the correct one.
the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
which is what worries me. They SHOULD NOT RESOLVE externally. I was hoping
they would
Just noticed in my logs that when named starts up this is what happens:
Feb 6 08:17:19 server named[8251]: hint zone (IN) loaded (serial 0)
Feb 6 08:17:19 server named[8251]: Zone 0.0.127.in-addr.arpa (file
named.local): No default TTL ($TTL value) set, using SOA minimum instead
Feb 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 08:09 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
Just noticed in my logs that when named starts up this is what happens:
[snip]
(eth0) Feb 6 08:17:19 server named[8251]: listening on
[203.59.196.224].53 (ppp0) Feb 6 08:17:19 server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 08:16 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote:
the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
which is what worries me. They SHOULD NOT RESOLVE externally. I was
hoping they would not. But, as you have found out,
ed == Edward Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
ed sorry, domain.com was just the example I used Gerry.
ed your first answer is the correct one.
ed the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
ed
After a bit of investigation, it seems someone had indeed registered
dekkers.com way back in 1997.
The record was updated 28/12/2001, so I assume they've only just started
using it and we just hadn't noticed up until now. (Although a few 'niggly'
things now start to make sense)
The guy who
On 09:16 06 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
|
| the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
|
| which is what worries me. They SHOULD NOT RESOLVE externally. I was hoping
| they would not. But, as you
How do I stop that?
Tell it to stop. :)
[root@tuxfan etc]# head -10 /etc/named.conf
acl localnet { 192.168.0/24; 127.0.0.1/32; };
options {
directory /var/named;
allow-query { localnet; };
listen-on{ 192.168.0.3; 127.0.0.1; };
auth-nxdomain no;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 09:16 06 Feb 2002, Edward Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| domain.com belongs to a bank in Bethlehem, PA.
|
| the real names I use in here are based on the domain dekkers.com.
|
| which is what worries me. They SHOULD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Talkington wrote:
Either register the domain or use a nonexistent top level domain like .home.
Or use a split-horizon DNS resolver on your private network - one
that's a) only visible to your machines, and b) obeys your authority
for
25 matches
Mail list logo
