On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did
look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment
(i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS
mount, but again I wonder
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did
look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment
(i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS
mount, but again I
I would second that motion: avoid Clearcase like the plague. I have
personal experience with it. (I was forced to use it.)
Clearcase is extraordinarily expense compared to the alternatives, and
is extraordinarily complicated as well. It appeals only to pointy-haired
bosses.
In passing , I note
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
- if I do a chroot things work well except for I run into
issues with mounting mounts on top the RO filesystems (this
appears to be needed to provide access to our source control,
and give developers a scratch
Hi All,
I have been given the task reasearching possible ways of setting
up a development environment such that:
- Multiple releases can be supported on the same machine (e.g.
the perl in the 7.3 and 7.2 on the same machine).
- Try to avoid rebuilding (and altering)
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes.
What you load on what virtual box is up to you.
Conceptually, even kernel panics are kept isolated to their own virtual box.
I have not yet
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
No I haven't but that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.
Not that its the perfect soultion necessarily (I still have to play
with it), but I needed some advice from out side the box I was
thinking in (-:
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/
With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes.
What you load on what virtual box is up to you.
Conceptually, even kernel panics are kept isolated to their own virtual box.
I have not yet
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux)
No I haven't but that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for.
Not that its the perfect soultion necessarily (I still have to play
with it), but I needed some advice from out side the box I was
thinking in (-:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful editors etc...
Nick
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful editors etc...
Strongly suggest you take a good look at CodeCrusader and CodeMedic.
They're available from CalTech (California Institute of Technology
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote:
Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
environments for Linux.
vi? ;)
I'm talking nice colourful editors etc...
Then you'll probably want to have a look at http://www.kdevelop.org/.
KDevelop is also included in Powertools.
LLaP
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote:
Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
environments for Linux.
vi? ;)
I'm talking nice colourful editors etc...
Then you'll probably want to have a look at http
check out vim (VI Improved).
homepage: http://www.vim.org
Raju
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 10:40:04PM +, Nick [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful editors etc...
Nick
Raju K V wrote:
check out vim (VI Improved).
homepage: http://www.vim.org
Raju
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 10:40:04PM +, Nick [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Hi
Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development
environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful
15 matches
Mail list logo