Re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-15 Thread James Olin Oden
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote: The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS mount, but again I wonder

Re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-15 Thread Richard Troy
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote: The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS mount, but again I

Re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-15 Thread Vladimir G. Ivanovic
I would second that motion: avoid Clearcase like the plague. I have personal experience with it. (I was forced to use it.) Clearcase is extraordinarily expense compared to the alternatives, and is extraordinarily complicated as well. It appeals only to pointy-haired bosses. In passing , I note

Re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-15 Thread Elliot Lee
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote: - if I do a chroot things work well except for I run into issues with mounting mounts on top the RO filesystems (this appears to be needed to provide access to our source control, and give developers a scratch

Build/Development environments...

2002-06-14 Thread James Olin Oden
Hi All, I have been given the task reasearching possible ways of setting up a development environment such that: - Multiple releases can be supported on the same machine (e.g. the perl in the 7.3 and 7.2 on the same machine). - Try to avoid rebuilding (and altering)

re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-14 Thread Greg Freemyer
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux) http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes. What you load on what virtual box is up to you. Conceptually, even kernel panics are kept isolated to their own virtual box. I have not yet

Re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-14 Thread James Olin Oden
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux) No I haven't but that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. Not that its the perfect soultion necessarily (I still have to play with it), but I needed some advice from out side the box I was thinking in (-:

re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-14 Thread Greg Freemyer
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux) http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ With it, you create a series of independent virtual Linux boxes. What you load on what virtual box is up to you. Conceptually, even kernel panics are kept isolated to their own virtual box. I have not yet

Re: Build/Development environments...

2002-06-14 Thread John Summerfield
Have you looked at UML (User Mode Linux) No I haven't but that is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. Not that its the perfect soultion necessarily (I still have to play with it), but I needed some advice from out side the box I was thinking in (-:

Re: Development Environments

2000-02-29 Thread Nitebirdz
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote: Hi Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful editors etc... Nick -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: Development Environments

2000-02-28 Thread Rick Forrister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful editors etc... Strongly suggest you take a good look at CodeCrusader and CodeMedic. They're available from CalTech (California Institute of Technology

Re: Development Environments

2000-02-27 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote: Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development environments for Linux. vi? ;) I'm talking nice colourful editors etc... Then you'll probably want to have a look at http://www.kdevelop.org/. KDevelop is also included in Powertools. LLaP

Re: Development Environments

2000-02-27 Thread M. Erickson
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Nick wrote: Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development environments for Linux. vi? ;) I'm talking nice colourful editors etc... Then you'll probably want to have a look at http

Re: Development Environments

2000-02-27 Thread Raju K V
check out vim (VI Improved). homepage: http://www.vim.org Raju On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 10:40:04PM +, Nick [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful editors etc... Nick

Re: Development Environments

2000-02-27 Thread Toby A. Rider
Raju K V wrote: check out vim (VI Improved). homepage: http://www.vim.org Raju On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 10:40:04PM +, Nick [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Hi Does anybody know of any free (or very cheap) NICE C development environments for Linux. I'm talking nice colourful