Wrong.
What compiler do you think Red Hat uses to compile their 2.4 kernels?
(they use 2.96 on 7.x)
what do they use for RH8.0? I've been unable to compile a kernel with
either gcc 3.1 or 2.96 (both latest rpms from RedHat).
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o parport.o share.o ieee1284.o ieee1284_ops.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:39:18 -0600, mark wrote:
Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just
fine.
Wrong.
About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19 (seems to be
the real stable release). I was getting
Hello mark,
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 1:39:18 AM, you textually orated:
m Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just fine.
m Wrong.
m About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19 (seems to be the
m real stable release). I was getting SEGVs, alternating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 03:55 pm, mark wrote:
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 10:55 am, you is done writ:
I have attempted to compile rpms for 7.3 using the files in
compat-gcc rpms
However after using CC=gcc296 CXX=g++296
To quote an
Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just fine.
Wrong.
About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19 (seems to be the
real stable release). I was getting SEGVs, alternating with undefined
functions or variables. I finally succeded only by doing the make
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:39:18AM -0600, mark wrote:
also work but is not as safe, and *gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer supported*.
Ok? No FUD, personal knowledge, and documented in the source.
Nope. Its still FUD.
Read further, ./Documentation/Changes:
Note that gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer a
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, mark wrote:
Several folks say I should ignore my friend, and that gcc 2.96 is just fine.
Recent versions are.
Wrong.
What compiler do you think Red Hat uses to compile their 2.4 kernels?
(they use 2.96 on 7.x)
About a week ago, *I* was compiling a new kernel, 2.4.19
