On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:40:20 -0500, Ed Wilts wrote
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:31:41PM -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
I am trying to plan for what action will need to be done due to the
demise of RHL. Some have suggested that Fedora will be a logical
replacement. Others have said that yum/apt
..lol. out of proportion. Red Hat
rules
Wade
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can I update from
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:40:23 -0400, Jef Spaleta wrote
Cristian Stefan wrote:
Hi I am new to RH and i have installed RH9 and managed to update it
with apt4rpm .So...
The obvious question is :
How can I manage to put some repositories to get a dist-upgrade from RH9
to Fedora ?
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:17:36 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
If I read this exchange correctly, Fedora may not be a RH 10 equivalent for
those users of previous versions of RHL. Not a good sign?
Can you explain this question a bit? No part of what you
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:33:46 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:17:36 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
If I read this exchange correctly, Fedora may not be a RH 10 equivalent for
those users of previous versions of RHL. Not a
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:31:41PM -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
I am trying to plan for what action will need to be done due to the
demise of RHL. Some have suggested that Fedora will be a logical
replacement. Others have said that yum/apt might be used in place of
up2date. Still others have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:34:35 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
[Recycling the reply I posted to redhat-list and fedora-list just a
few minutes ago. Why the separate cross-post?]
Because not everyone subscribes to all three lists and I want to get
