Have you checked the log files (/var/log/boot.log) for errors?
Mark
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Paul Greene wrote:
> So, nothing was obviously wrong with the lilo.conf file? (just to make sure
> the lilo.conf file was eliminated as a potential problem or not)
>
> I downloaded the src file from the N
So, nothing was obviously wrong with the lilo.conf file? (just to make sure
the lilo.conf file was eliminated as a potential problem or not)
I downloaded the src file from the NSA website, used the 7.1 Redhat version
they said was the version used for developing selinux (just to avoid any
comp
Looks like a bad kernel download to me. OH, you do have all of the
correct modules for that kernel, right?
Mark
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Paul Greene wrote:
> I'm trying to play with the NSA selinux kernel and am having trouble
> getting the system to boot.
>
> The Redhat version is 7.1. When the
I'm trying to play with the NSA selinux kernel and am having trouble
getting the system to boot.
The Redhat version is 7.1. When the lilo boot menu pops up it gives me a
choice of "linux" (the standard kernel) or "selinux" (the NSA selinux
kernel). If I select "selinux" the line "booting selin
Quick lilo question
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Drew Hunt wrote:
> When I moved up to 7.0 I forgot the lilo.conf line to make sure that all
of
> the memory is used. I have a 96MB RAM machine that is only registering
> 64MB. What's that command, again?
append="mem=96M" I think
On Tuesday, January 23, 2001 12:54 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
| On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Prashant Ramachandra wrote:
|
| > | Is it the BIOS or the kernel that had the "I can't see all the
| > | memory"
| > | issue? I have 128MB and I have no problem.. never did :)
| >
|
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Prashant Ramachandra wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:17 AM, Statux [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> wrote:
> | On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Drew Hunt wrote:
> |
> | > When I moved up to 7.0 I forgot the lilo.conf line to make sure
> | > that all of
> | > the memory is used. I hav
On Tuesday, January 23, 2001 5:17 AM, Statux [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
| On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Drew Hunt wrote:
|
| > When I moved up to 7.0 I forgot the lilo.conf line to make sure
| > that all of
| > the memory is used. I have a 96MB RAM machine that is only
| > registering
| > 64MB. Wha
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Drew Hunt wrote:
> When I moved up to 7.0 I forgot the lilo.conf line to make sure that all of
> the memory is used. I have a 96MB RAM machine that is only registering
> 64MB. What's that command, again?
append="mem=96M" I think it is.
Is it the BIOS or the kernel that ha
> "dh" == Drew Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
dh> When I moved up to 7.0 I forgot the lilo.conf line to make sure that all of
dh> the memory is used. I have a 96MB RAM machine that is only registering
dh> 64MB. What's that command, again?
append="mem=96M"
--
Ray Curtis Unix Pro
When I moved up to 7.0 I forgot the lilo.conf line to make sure that all of
the memory is used. I have a 96MB RAM machine that is only registering
64MB. What's that command, again?
Thanks,
Drew
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:/
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Wagner, Joseph wrote:
> Also, make sure the hard disk you're booting off of is on your primary
> ribbon. LILO won't work off the secondary ribbon.
>
This is BIOS dependant. As long as your BIOS can access the drive, LILO
will work with it. There are some extra steps when
Also, make sure the hard disk you're booting off of is on your primary
ribbon. LILO won't work off the secondary ribbon.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
It might mean that the disk is bad. (This doesn't contradict at all what
others here have said... it's just another possible reason.)
hth,
kf
--
My recommendation: Don't shop at Explorer Micro, Columbus, Ohio.
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Justin Zygmont wrote:
= This is from the RH install FAQ...
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Justin Zygmont wrote:
> This is from the RH install FAQ...
>
>
> When my machine boots, all it says is 'LI' and then it freezes. What is
> the problem?
>
> Answer:
>
> This means that LILO (the Linux bootloader) is having problems
> bootstrapping itself to the system. T
This is from the RH install FAQ...
When my machine boots, all it says is 'LI' and then it freezes. What is
the problem?
Answer:
This means that LILO (the Linux bootloader) is having problems
bootstrapping itself to the system. There are a
couple of things that may be causing this. You may ha
I assume you ran lilo before you rebooted?
Eddie Strohmier
Bonwell Globalnet
www.bonwell.com
- Original Message -
From: Ketan Gandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 6:35 PM
Subject: FW: LILO question
> I tried adding this t
t; increase/change the partition size of say, the swap partition?
> thanks in advance
> ketan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eddie Strohmier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 1:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LILO question
&g
partition?
thanks in advance
ketan
-Original Message-
From: Eddie Strohmier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: LILO question
It really has nothing to do with linux and all to do with your Bios. I have
two machines ru
> guys,
> I read somewhere that Linux only recognizes 64MB
> RAM and that if one has more installed, then the
> 'mem' parameter in LILO has to be set
> accordingly.
> Can someone tell me how to check if Linux
> recognizes the entire memory that I have and
> also, how do i check/change this 'mem
Ketan,
free
Gustav
Ketan wrote:
>
> guys,
> I read somewhere that Linux only recognizes 64MB
> RAM and that if one has more installed, then the
> 'mem' parameter in LILO has to be set
> accordingly.
> Can someone tell me how to check if Linux
> recognizes the entire memory that I have and
> al
Hope this helps,
Eddie Strohmier
Bonwell Globalnet
www.bonwell.com
- Original Message -
From: Ketan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 2:42 PM
Subject: LILO question
> guys,
> I read somewhere that Linux only recognizes 64MB
&g
I have 98 megs and didn't need to add the 'mem' paramater.
Type 'free' and see what your system recognizes.
Jason Hirsch
--
Jason Hirsch, ChemEng/Chemistry
Make it myself? But I'm a physical organic chemist!
Visit the Dorm Room Life may never
http://icdweb.cc.purdue.edu
guys,
I read somewhere that Linux only recognizes 64MB
RAM and that if one has more installed, then the
'mem' parameter in LILO has to be set
accordingly.
Can someone tell me how to check if Linux
recognizes the entire memory that I have and
also, how do i check/change this 'mem' LILO
parameter ?
> My friend has just started his installation of RH 5.0. He tells me
> everytime he tries to run LILO, his whole screen starts scrolling 'LO'
> and he has to shut off the computer. He's tried alternate methods the
> the HOWTO's have shown but to no avail...any suggestions???
My friend has just started his installation of RH 5.0. He tells me
everytime he tries to run LILO, his whole screen starts scrolling 'LO'
and he has to shut off the computer. He's tried alternate methods the
the HOWTO's have shown but to no avail...any suggestions???
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
